Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic TS1
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7fcc/b7fcccbf1c56bb0e8151822b3afff700e259a372" alt="Olympus E-500 front Olympus E-500 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43ffc/43ffc5718422e6e3eca344eb7e4a55ae79707d20" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS1 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS1 front"
93 Imaging
34 Features
24 Overall
30
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic TS1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Announced October 2005
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-500
- Updated by Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-128mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 189g - 98 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FT1
- Refreshed by Panasonic TS2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic TS1 Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Olympus E-500 versus Panasonic TS1, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and TS1 (12MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and TS1 (1/2.3") feature different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-500 was released 4 years prior to the TS1 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic TS1 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the E-500 matches up versus the TS1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic TS1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-500 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS1. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-500 Gallery and Panasonic TS1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Panasonic TS1
E-500 | TS1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic TS1 over the Olympus E-500
TS1 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2009 | ![]() | October 2005 | Newer by 39 months |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 215k | Crisper screen (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic TS1
E-500 | TS1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic TS1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-500 offers outer dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) while the Panasonic TS1 has proportions of 98mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 189 grams (0.42 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-500 versus Panasonic TS1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the E-500 against the TS1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/feee8/feee877b95014c536d5a3648e00d603b549aa213" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic TS1 size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic TS1 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and TS1 is 70 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c7b84/c7b84f835096ab1d5da353e4b4ed270bed3749b2" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic TS1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic TS1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic TS1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions purely by researching specs. The picture below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-500 and TS1.
All in all, each of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-500 due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh easier and the Panasonic TS1 will provide you with extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged E-500 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c945a/c945a98e41a2ce9a12035105f7894d718b974a7c" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic TS1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic TS1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic TS1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/652e4/652e40bf2d8ae619de4c630ae62466d5c7463691" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic TS1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic TS1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic TS1 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS1 |
Also referred to as | EVOLT E-500 | Lumix DMC-FT1 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Announced | 2005-10-21 | 2009-01-27 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-128mm (4.6x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 215k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1300 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | AVCHD Lite |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 479 gr (1.06 pounds) | 189 gr (0.42 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 98 x 63 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/MMC/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $600 | $380 |