Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZR3
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
94 Imaging
36 Features
26 Overall
32
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZR3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Revealed October 2005
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-500
- Later Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 159g - 98 x 55 x 26mm
- Launched January 2010
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-ZX3
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZR3 Overview
Here is a in depth assessment of the Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZR3, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and ZR3 (14MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and ZR3 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-500 was announced 5 years earlier than the ZR3 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZR3 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a complete comparison, below is a short introduction of how the E-500 matches up against the ZR3 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZR3 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-500 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-500 Gallery and Panasonic ZR3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Panasonic ZR3
E-500 | ZR3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZR3 over the Olympus E-500
ZR3 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2010 | October 2005 | Fresher by 51 months | |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 215k | Clearer screen (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic ZR3
E-500 | ZR3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither provides Touch screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZR3 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-500 provides outer dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) while the Panasonic ZR3 has dimensions of 98mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") along with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZR3 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at that moment. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the E-500 compared to the ZR3.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-500 and ZR3 is 70 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZR3 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizing simply by seeing specifications. The photograph here will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-500 and ZR3.
Plainly, both cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-500 with its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Panasonic ZR3 will show greater detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older E-500 will be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZR3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZR3 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-500 | Lumix DMC-ZX3 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2005-10-21 | 2010-01-26 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-200mm (8.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 215k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1300 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.30 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | AVCHD Lite |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 479g (1.06 lb) | 159g (0.35 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 98 x 55 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $600 | $280 |