Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZR3

Portability
70
Imaging
41
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 front
Portability
94
Imaging
36
Features
26
Overall
32

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZR3 Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Revealed October 2005
  • Alternative Name is EVOLT E-500
  • Later Model is Olympus E-510
Panasonic ZR3
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-200mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
  • 159g - 98 x 55 x 26mm
  • Launched January 2010
  • Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-ZX3
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZR3 Overview

Here is a in depth assessment of the Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZR3, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and ZR3 (14MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and ZR3 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor dimensions.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-500 was announced 5 years earlier than the ZR3 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZR3 being a Compact camera.

Before going through a complete comparison, below is a short introduction of how the E-500 matches up against the ZR3 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Panasonic ZR3

 E-500 ZR3 
Manual focus More accurate focus

Reasons to pick Panasonic ZR3 over the Olympus E-500

 ZR3 E-500 
LaunchedJanuary 2010October 2005Fresher by 51 months
Screen sizing2.7"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.2")
Screen resolution230k215kClearer screen (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic ZR3

 E-500 ZR3 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch screen Neither provides Touch screen

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZR3 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to carry your camera, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-500 provides outer dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) while the Panasonic ZR3 has dimensions of 98mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") along with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZR3 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at that moment. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the E-500 compared to the ZR3.

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZR3 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-500 and ZR3 is 70 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZR3 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZR3 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is very hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizing simply by seeing specifications. The photograph here will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-500 and ZR3.

Plainly, both cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-500 with its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Panasonic ZR3 will show greater detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older E-500 will be behind in sensor tech.

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZR3 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZR3 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZR3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-500 Portrait photography factors
Panasonic ZR3 Portrait photography factors
48
manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
no liveview feature
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
28
resolution is good (14MP)
no manual focus
no manual exposure
no external flash support
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-500
Street photography with Panasonic ZR3
56
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
lighter than competition in class (479 grams)
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
56
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Sports photography camera
Panasonic ZR3 as a Sports photography camera
37
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect autofocus
no liveview feature
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8MP)
36
built in image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
supports tracking focus
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,300 seconds)
max fps low (2.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Travel photography camera
Panasonic ZR3 as a Travel photography camera
52
lighter than competition in class (479 grams)
has built in flash
lack of Time Lapse function
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
64
resolution is good (14MP)
has built in flash
relatively wide (25mm)
does not have Timelapse function
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Landscape photography camera
Panasonic ZR3 as a Landscape photography camera
43
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
tiny screen (2.5 inches)
no liveview feature
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8MP)
maximum ISO low (400)
lack of Time Lapse function
37
relatively wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (14MP)
no manual focus
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
tiny screen (2.7")
no manual exposure
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
does not have Timelapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 Vlogging info
Panasonic ZR3 Vlogging info
9
no video
29
relatively wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have microphone support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZR3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Panasonic ZR3
 Olympus E-500Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3
General Information
Make Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus E-500 Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-500 Lumix DMC-ZX3
Class Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2005-10-21 2010-01-26
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - Venus Engine HD II
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3264 x 2448 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 400 6400
Highest boosted ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 3 11
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-200mm (8.0x)
Largest aperture - f/3.3-5.9
Macro focusing distance - 3cm
Available lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.5 inch 2.7 inch
Display resolution 215k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1300 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 13.00 m (at ISO 100) 5.30 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1280x720
Video format - AVCHD Lite
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 479g (1.06 lb) 159g (0.35 lb)
Dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 98 x 55 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Retail cost $600 $280