Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS40

Portability
70
Imaging
42
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS40 front
Portability
90
Imaging
43
Features
58
Overall
49

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS40 Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Revealed October 2005
  • Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-500
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-510
Panasonic ZS40
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-720mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
  • 240g - 111 x 64 x 34mm
  • Released January 2014
  • Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-TZ60
  • Succeeded the Panasonic ZS35
  • Refreshed by Panasonic ZS45
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS40 Overview

On this page, we will be looking at the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic ZS40, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a significant difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and ZS40 (18MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and ZS40 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizes.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-500 was manufactured 9 years before the ZS40 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS40 being a Compact camera.

Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-500 matches up against the ZS40 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Panasonic ZS40

 E-500 ZS40 

Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS40 over the Olympus E-500

 ZS40 E-500 
ReleasedJanuary 2014October 2005More recent by 99 months
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution920k215kCrisper screen (+705k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic ZS40

 E-500 ZS40 
Manually focus Very precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch screen No Touch screen

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS40 Physical Comparison

If you're intending to lug around your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-500 has got physical measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") having a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS40 has dimensions of 111mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 240 grams (0.53 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic ZS40 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the E-500 and the ZS40.

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS40 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and ZS40 is 70 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS40 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS40 Sensor Comparison

Generally, its hard to visualise the difference in sensor measurements just by researching specifications. The visual below will help give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-500 and ZS40.

To sum up, both cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-500 because of its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Panasonic ZS40 will render more detail due to its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures more aggressively. The older E-500 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS40 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS40 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS40 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Portrait photography camera
Panasonic ZS40 as a Portrait photography camera
49
focusing manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
no liveview feature
low resolution (8 megapixels)
52
manual focus
megapixel count good (18 megapixels)
features face detection focus
supports RAW files
external flash not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 Street photography advice
Panasonic ZS40 Street photography advice
57
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
lighter than average (479g)
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
69
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW files
lighter than competitors in class (240 grams)
no moving screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Sports photography camera
Panasonic ZS40 as a Sports photography camera
37
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect AF
no liveview feature
max fps low (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (8 megapixels)
54
amazing zoom range (24-720mm 30.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (18 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Travel photography camera
Panasonic ZS40 as a Travel photography camera
52
lighter than average (479g)
built-in flash
lack of Timelapse mode
low resolution (8MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
69
lighter than competitors in class (240g)
megapixel count good (18 megapixels)
has built in flash
decently wide (24mm)
very long zoom (720mm)
does not have Timelapse function
does not have a selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-500
Landscape photography with Panasonic ZS40
43
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
screen is small (2.5")
no liveview feature
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (8 megapixels)
max ISO too low (400)
lack of Timelapse mode
56
manual focus
decently wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (18MP)
supports RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have Timelapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 Vlogging advice
Panasonic ZS40 Vlogging advice
9
can't shoot video
34
decently wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors in class (240g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
does not have a selfie friendly display
does not have external microphone support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS40 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Panasonic ZS40
 Olympus E-500Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS40
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus E-500 Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS40
Also called as EVOLT E-500 Lumix DMC-TZ60
Type Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2005-10-21 2014-01-06
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - Venus Engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 18MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3264 x 2448 4896 x 3672
Highest native ISO 400 3200
Highest enhanced ISO 1600 6400
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 3 23
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-720mm (30.0x)
Largest aperture - f/3.3-6.4
Macro focus range - 3cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.5" 3"
Display resolution 215k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display tech - TFT LCD with AR coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 200k dots
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 13.00 m (at ISO 100) 6.40 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60p/60i/30p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 479 grams (1.06 pounds) 240 grams (0.53 pounds)
Physical dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 111 x 64 x 34mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 300 photographs
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Cost at release $600 $450