Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS45
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS45 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Introduced October 2005
- Other Name is EVOLT E-500
- Newer Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 249g - 108 x 60 x 32mm
- Released January 2015
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-TZ57
- Replaced the Panasonic ZS40
- Replacement is Panasonic ZS50
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS45 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS45, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and ZS45 (16MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and ZS45 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-500 was introduced 10 years earlier than the ZS45 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS45 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the E-500 scores versus the ZS45 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS45 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-500 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Panasonic ZS45 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Panasonic ZS45
E-500 | ZS45 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS45 over the Olympus E-500
ZS45 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2015 | October 2005 | Newer by 112 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 215k | Sharper display (+825k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic ZS45
E-500 | ZS45 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS45 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-500 features physical measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS45 has proportions of 108mm x 60mm x 32mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
See the Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS45 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the E-500 and the ZS45.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and ZS45 is 70 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS45 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions only by looking through specifications. The picture below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-500 and ZS45.
To sum up, each of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-500 with its larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic ZS45 will result in greater detail using its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-500 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS45 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS45 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45 |
Also called | EVOLT E-500 | Lumix DMC-TZ57 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2005-10-21 | 2015-01-06 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 215 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 479 grams (1.06 lb) | 249 grams (0.55 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 108 x 60 x 32mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $600 | $300 |