Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS50
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
90 Imaging
37 Features
57 Overall
45
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Introduced October 2005
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-500
- Successor is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 243g - 111 x 65 x 34mm
- Revealed January 2015
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-TZ70
- Earlier Model is Panasonic ZS45
- Updated by Panasonic ZS60
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS50 Overview
Below is a extensive comparison of the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic ZS50, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and ZS50 (12MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and ZS50 (1/2.3") use different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-500 was released 10 years before the ZS50 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS50 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple summation of how the E-500 scores versus the ZS50 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS50 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-500 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Panasonic ZS50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Panasonic ZS50
E-500 | ZS50 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS50 over the Olympus E-500
ZS50 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2015 | October 2005 | More recent by 112 months | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 215k | Crisper screen (+825k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic ZS50
E-500 | ZS50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither offers Touch screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS50 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-500 offers outside dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") having a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS50 has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 34mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic ZS50 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using during that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-500 versus the ZS50.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and ZS50 is 70 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS50 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements purely by looking at technical specs. The graphic below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-500 and ZS50.
As you can tell, each of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-500 because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic ZS50 will give you extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The older E-500 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS50 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS50 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50 |
Also called as | EVOLT E-500 | Lumix DMC-TZ70 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2005-10-21 | 2015-01-06 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 215k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,166k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | 0.46x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p/60i/30p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 479 grams (1.06 pounds) | 243 grams (0.54 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 111 x 65 x 34mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 44 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.2 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 138 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 shots |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $600 | $350 |