Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS7

Portability
70
Imaging
41
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7 front
Portability
91
Imaging
35
Features
33
Overall
34

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS7 Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Launched October 2005
  • Alternative Name is EVOLT E-500
  • Successor is Olympus E-510
Panasonic ZS7
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-300mm (F3.3-4.9) lens
  • 218g - 103 x 60 x 33mm
  • Announced July 2011
  • Other Name is Lumix DMC-TZ10
  • Successor is Panasonic ZS8
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS7 Overview

In this write-up, we are looking at the Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS7, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and ZS7 (12MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and ZS7 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizing.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-500 was revealed 6 years before the ZS7 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS7 being a Compact camera.

Before delving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise summary of how the E-500 scores against the ZS7 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Panasonic ZS7

 E-500 ZS7 
Focus manually Dial precise focus

Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS7 over the Olympus E-500

 ZS7 E-500 
AnnouncedJuly 2011October 2005Fresher by 69 months
Display sizing3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k215kClearer display (+245k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic ZS7

 E-500 ZS7 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither offers Touch friendly display

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS7 Physical Comparison

When you are looking to carry your camera, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-500 offers physical measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") having a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS7 has dimensions of 103mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS7 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the E-500 compared to the ZS7.

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS7 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-500 and ZS7 is 70 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS7 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS7 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it's difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizing simply by reviewing specs. The photograph underneath might give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-500 and ZS7.

As you can plainly see, each of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-500 having a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Panasonic ZS7 will offer you more detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The older E-500 is going to be behind in sensor technology.

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS7 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS7 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS7 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Portrait photography camera
Panasonic ZS7 as a Portrait photography camera
48
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
doesn't have liveview
low MP (8 megapixels)
21
no manual focus
can't use external flash
MP count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 Street photography highlights
Panasonic ZS7 Street photography highlights
56
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
lighter than competition in class (479 grams)
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
60
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (218 grams)
screen is fixed
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-500
Sports photography with Panasonic ZS7
37
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect auto focus
doesn't have liveview
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
low MP (8 megapixels)
27
image stabilization (Optical)
low frames per second (2.0 frames per second)
MP count low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-500
Travel photography with Panasonic ZS7
52
lighter than competition in class (479g)
flash built-in
no Timelapse function
low MP (8MP)
does not posses selfie friendly display
63
lighter than competitors (218 grams)
flash built-in
rather wide (25mm)
long reach (300mm)
lack of Timelapse function
MP count low (12MP)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-500
Landscape photography with Panasonic ZS7
43
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
tiny screen (2.5 inch)
doesn't have liveview
does not have image stabilization
low MP (8MP)
maximum ISO low (400)
no Timelapse function
38
rather wide (25mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
lack of Timelapse function
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 Vlogging factors
Panasonic ZS7 Vlogging factors
9
no video
30
rather wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (218 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of microphone socket
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS7 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Panasonic ZS7
 Olympus E-500Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7
General Information
Brand Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus E-500 Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7
Also Known as EVOLT E-500 Lumix DMC-TZ10
Class Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2005-10-21 2011-07-19
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Venus Engine HD II
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3264 x 2448 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 400 6400
Highest boosted ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 3 11
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-300mm (12.0x)
Largest aperture - f/3.3-4.9
Macro focusing distance - 3cm
Total lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.5" 3"
Screen resolution 215k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 60s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 3.0fps 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 13.00 m (at ISO 100) 5.30 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - AVCHD Lite
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 479g (1.06 lb) 218g (0.48 lb)
Dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 103 x 60 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots One One
Launch cost $600 $350