Olympus E-500 vs Pentax K-500
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7fcc/b7fcccbf1c56bb0e8151822b3afff700e259a372" alt="Olympus E-500 front Olympus E-500 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7664a/7664a04951cdb8a34b9dfe4c6285125ada24205c" alt="Pentax K-500 front Pentax K-500 front"
64 Imaging
58 Features
70 Overall
62
Olympus E-500 vs Pentax K-500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Launched October 2005
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-500
- Updated by Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 51600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 646g - 130 x 97 x 71mm
- Introduced November 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Pentax K-500 Overview
Here is a detailed overview of the Olympus E-500 vs Pentax K-500, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and K-500 (16MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and K-500 (APS-C) posses different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-500 was announced 9 years earlier than the K-500 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Pentax K-500 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the E-500 scores vs the K-500 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Pentax K-500 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-500 & Pentax K-500. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Pentax K-500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Pentax K-500
E-500 | K-500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax K-500 over the Olympus E-500
K-500 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | November 2013 | ![]() | October 2005 | Fresher by 98 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 215k | Sharper screen (+706k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Pentax K-500
E-500 | K-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Pentax K-500 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera often, you need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-500 has got outside measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) while the Pentax K-500 has sizing of 130mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") along with a weight of 646 grams (1.42 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-500 vs Pentax K-500 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the E-500 vs the K-500.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6b68/c6b68dd6e2e6b3ba4336d4cebe74ba03d8e7f746" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Pentax K-500 size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Pentax K-500 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-500 and K-500 is 70 and 64 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8263b/8263b0f7bea2ce5aaff886edd84434f4ddaadbe6" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Pentax K-500 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-500 vs Pentax K-500 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Pentax K-500 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizing just by going through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath should offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-500 and K-500.
As you can see, each of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-500 with its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF more challenging and the Pentax K-500 will provide extra detail with its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs more aggressively. The older E-500 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/56898/56898790138855c2d3f474e6a9ae5cf185b4348d" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Pentax K-500 sensor size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Pentax K-500 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Pentax K-500 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea3e7/ea3e74f30ab65943d669edc3d456b4113b5eadc5" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Pentax K-500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-500 vs Pentax K-500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Pentax K-500 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Pentax K-500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus E-500 | Pentax K-500 |
Also called | EVOLT E-500 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2005-10-21 | 2013-11-27 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | PRIME M |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4928 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 51600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 11 |
Cross type focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Available lenses | 45 | 151 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 215k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD monitor with brightness/color adjustment and AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | 0.61x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | 6.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync, Slow Sync+Redeye, Trailing Curtain Sync, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30,25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60,50,30,25,24 fps), 640 x 424 (30,25,24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 479 grams (1.06 lb) | 646 grams (1.42 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 130 x 97 x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1087 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 710 shots |
Style of battery | - | AA |
Battery ID | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $600 | $600 |