Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Pentax RZ10

Portability
70
Imaging
41
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Pentax Optio RZ10 front
Portability
92
Imaging
37
Features
31
Overall
34

Olympus E-500 vs Pentax RZ10 Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Released October 2005
  • Alternate Name is EVOLT E-500
  • Replacement is Olympus E-510
Pentax RZ10
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 178g - 97 x 61 x 33mm
  • Released July 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-500 vs Pentax RZ10 Overview

Below, we will be looking at the Olympus E-500 and Pentax RZ10, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Pentax. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and RZ10 (14MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and RZ10 (1/2.3") come with different sensor measurements.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-500 was launched 6 years earlier than the RZ10 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Pentax RZ10 being a Compact camera.

Before getting straight into a full comparison, below is a simple summary of how the E-500 scores vs the RZ10 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Pentax RZ10

 E-500 RZ10 

Reasons to pick Pentax RZ10 over the Olympus E-500

 RZ10 E-500 
ReleasedJuly 2011October 2005More recent by 69 months
Screen dimension2.7"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.2")
Screen resolution230k215kCrisper screen (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Pentax RZ10

 E-500 RZ10 
Focus manually More precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly screen No Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-500 vs Pentax RZ10 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-500 has outside measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Pentax RZ10 has sizing of 97mm x 61mm x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 178 grams (0.39 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-500 and Pentax RZ10 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-500 and the RZ10.

Olympus E-500 vs Pentax RZ10 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and RZ10 is 70 and 92 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Pentax RZ10 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Pentax RZ10 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be tough to imagine the difference in sensor measurements only by researching specs. The graphic here might give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-500 and RZ10.

All in all, the two cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-500 due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Pentax RZ10 will result in greater detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively. The older E-500 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-500 vs Pentax RZ10 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Pentax RZ10 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Pentax RZ10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-500 Portrait photography info
Pentax RZ10 Portrait photography info
48
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
doesn't have liveview
low megapixels (8 megapixels)
35
you can focus manually
good resolution (14 megapixels)
no manual control
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 Street photography advice
Pentax RZ10 Street photography advice
56
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
lighter than average in class (479 grams)
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
no moving screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-500 Sports photography info
Pentax RZ10 Sports photography info
37
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect autofocus
doesn't have liveview
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
low megapixels (8 megapixels)
40
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14MP)
has tracking autofocus
environment proofing
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
terrible battery life (178 shots)
no phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-500 Travel photography information
Pentax RZ10 Travel photography information
52
lighter than average in class (479g)
has built in flash
lack of Time Lapse mode
low megapixels (8MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
66
environment proofing
good resolution (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
decently wide (28mm)
great reach (280mm)
no Time Lapse mode
terrible battery life (178 per charge)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-500 Landscape photography details
Pentax RZ10 Landscape photography details
43
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
small screen (2.5 inch)
doesn't have liveview
no image stabilization
low megapixels (8 megapixels)
max ISO too low (400)
lack of Time Lapse mode
43
you can focus manually
decently wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
environment proofing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
no manual control
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
terrible battery life (178 shots)
no Time Lapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 Vlogging info
Pentax RZ10 Vlogging info
9
no video recording
28
decently wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
display is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external mic socket
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-500 vs Pentax RZ10 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Pentax RZ10
 Olympus E-500Pentax Optio RZ10
General Information
Make Olympus Pentax
Model type Olympus E-500 Pentax Optio RZ10
Alternate name EVOLT E-500 -
Category Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Released 2005-10-21 2011-07-19
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3264 x 2448 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 400 6400
Highest enhanced ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-280mm (10.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.2-5.9
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.5" 2.7"
Resolution of display 215 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display technology - TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 13.00 m (at ISO 100) 2.80 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 479g (1.06 lbs) 178g (0.39 lbs)
Dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 97 x 61 x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 178 photographs
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Cost at release $600 $200