Olympus E-500 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
90 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Olympus E-500 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Introduced October 2005
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-500
- Replacement is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced July 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-500 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Olympus E-500 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and WG-3 GPS (16MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and WG-3 GPS (1/2.3") provide different sensor size.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe E-500 was revealed 8 years before the WG-3 GPS which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Pentax WG-3 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a short overview of how the E-500 matches up against the WG-3 GPS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-500 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-500 and Pentax WG-3 GPS. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-500 Gallery and Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
| E-500 | WG-3 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Olympus E-500
| WG-3 GPS | E-500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2013 | October 2005 | More modern by 94 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 215k | Crisper display (+245k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Pentax WG-3 GPS
| E-500 | WG-3 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial exact focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Olympus E-500 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-500 has physical dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Pentax WG-3 GPS has proportions of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-500 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the E-500 vs the WG-3 GPS.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and WG-3 GPS is 70 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-500 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to picture the contrast in sensor sizes simply by going through technical specs. The pic underneath will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-500 and WG-3 GPS.
As you can tell, both cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-500 having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Pentax WG-3 GPS will show greater detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-500 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-500 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus E-500 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Specifications
| Olympus E-500 | Pentax WG-3 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus E-500 | Pentax WG-3 GPS |
| Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-500 | - |
| Type | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2005-10-21 | 2013-07-19 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Number of lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 215k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 479 gr (1.06 lbs) | 238 gr (0.52 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photographs |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $600 | $350 |