Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS

Portability
70
Imaging
41
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Pentax WG-3 GPS front
Portability
90
Imaging
39
Features
43
Overall
40

Olympus E-500 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Introduced October 2005
  • Additionally Known as EVOLT E-500
  • Replacement is Olympus E-510
Pentax WG-3 GPS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
  • Introduced July 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-500 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Overview

On this page, we are comparing the Olympus E-500 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and WG-3 GPS (16MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and WG-3 GPS (1/2.3") provide different sensor size.

Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

The E-500 was revealed 8 years before the WG-3 GPS which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Pentax WG-3 GPS being a Compact camera.

Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a short overview of how the E-500 matches up against the WG-3 GPS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Pentax WG-3 GPS

 E-500 WG-3 GPS 

Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Olympus E-500

 WG-3 GPS E-500 
IntroducedJuly 2013October 2005More modern by 94 months
Display dimensions3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k215kCrisper display (+245k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Pentax WG-3 GPS

 E-500 WG-3 GPS 
Manually focus Dial exact focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch display Lacking Touch display

Olympus E-500 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-500 has physical dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Pentax WG-3 GPS has proportions of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-500 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the E-500 vs the WG-3 GPS.

Olympus E-500 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and WG-3 GPS is 70 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Sensor Comparison

Often, it is very tough to picture the contrast in sensor sizes simply by going through technical specs. The pic underneath will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-500 and WG-3 GPS.

As you can tell, both cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-500 having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Pentax WG-3 GPS will show greater detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-500 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-500 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-500
Portrait photography with Pentax WG-3 GPS
48
you can focus manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
megapixel count low (8MP)
40
has manual focus
resolution is good (16MP)
supports face detection autofocus
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-500
Street photography with Pentax WG-3 GPS
56
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
lighter than competition (479g)
fixed screen
no image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
58
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
screen does not articulate
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
more heavy than average (238 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-500
Sports photography with Pentax WG-3 GPS
37
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect AF
doesn't have liveview
slow fps (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (8MP)
44
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
environment proof
no shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
terrible battery power (240 per charge)
lack of phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-500 Travel photography details
Pentax WG-3 GPS Travel photography details
52
lighter than competition (479g)
flash built-in
lack of Time Lapse recording
megapixel count low (8MP)
display is not selfie friendly
68
environment proof
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
quite wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
terrible battery power (240 shots)
more heavy than average (238g)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Landscape photography camera
Pentax WG-3 GPS as a Landscape photography camera
43
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
small screen (2.5")
doesn't have liveview
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (8MP)
low max ISO (400)
lack of Time Lapse recording
53
has manual focus
quite wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
good sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
environment proof
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
manual mode not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
terrible battery power (240 CIPA)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 Vlogging info
Pentax WG-3 GPS Vlogging info
9
no video
34
quite wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
does not have external microphone socket
more heavy than average (238g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-500 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Pentax WG-3 GPS
 Olympus E-500Pentax WG-3 GPS
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Pentax
Model type Olympus E-500 Pentax WG-3 GPS
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-500 -
Type Advanced DSLR Waterproof
Introduced 2005-10-21 2013-07-19
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3264 x 2448 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 400 6400
Maximum boosted ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 125
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-100mm (4.0x)
Max aperture - f/2.0-4.9
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.5 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 215k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display tech - Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 4s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting rate 3.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 13.00 m (at ISO 100) 3.40 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 479 gr (1.06 lbs) 238 gr (0.52 lbs)
Physical dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 240 photographs
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal
Card slots One One
Retail cost $600 $350