Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh CX1
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
93 Imaging
31 Features
30 Overall
30
Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Introduced October 2005
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-500
- Successor is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2009
Photography Glossary Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh CX1 Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-500 versus Ricoh CX1, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the E-500 (8MP) and the CX1 (9MP) is very comparable but the E-500 (Four Thirds) and CX1 (1/2.3") have different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-500 was announced 4 years prior to the CX1 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a in depth comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the E-500 scores versus the CX1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh CX1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-500 & Ricoh CX1. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Ricoh CX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Ricoh CX1
| E-500 | CX1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Olympus E-500
| CX1 | E-500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2009 | October 2005 | More recent by 40 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 215k | Crisper display (+705k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Ricoh CX1
| E-500 | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-500 comes with physical dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Ricoh CX1 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-500 versus Ricoh CX1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the E-500 compared to the CX1.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and CX1 is 70 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to imagine the gap in sensor measurements merely by checking out a spec sheet. The visual here might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-500 and CX1.
As you can see, both of those cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-500 with its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Ricoh CX1 will provide extra detail with its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The older E-500 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications
| Olympus E-500 | Ricoh CX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus E-500 | Ricoh CX1 |
| Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-500 | - |
| Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2005-10-21 | 2009-02-19 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 215 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 640x480 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 479 gr (1.06 lbs) | 180 gr (0.40 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $600 | $299 |