Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh CX1

Portability
70
Imaging
41
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Ricoh CX1 front
Portability
93
Imaging
31
Features
30
Overall
30

Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Introduced October 2005
  • Additionally Known as EVOLT E-500
  • Successor is Olympus E-510
Ricoh CX1
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
  • 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
  • Introduced February 2009
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh CX1 Overview

Lets look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-500 versus Ricoh CX1, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the E-500 (8MP) and the CX1 (9MP) is very comparable but the E-500 (Four Thirds) and CX1 (1/2.3") have different sensor size.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-500 was announced 4 years prior to the CX1 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera.

Before delving right into a in depth comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the E-500 scores versus the CX1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Ricoh CX1

 E-500 CX1 

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Olympus E-500

 CX1 E-500 
IntroducedFebruary 2009October 2005More recent by 40 months
Display dimensions3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution920k215kCrisper display (+705k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Ricoh CX1

 E-500 CX1 
Manual focus Dial exact focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lack of Touch friendly display

Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to lug around your camera, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-500 comes with physical dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Ricoh CX1 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-500 versus Ricoh CX1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the E-500 compared to the CX1.

Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh CX1 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and CX1 is 70 and 93 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh CX1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison

Usually, its difficult to imagine the gap in sensor measurements merely by checking out a spec sheet. The visual here might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-500 and CX1.

As you can see, both of those cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-500 with its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Ricoh CX1 will provide extra detail with its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The older E-500 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh CX1 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh CX1 as a Portrait photography camera
48
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
no liveview feature
low megapixels (8MP)
25
has manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
resolution not great (9 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 Street photography highlights
Ricoh CX1 Street photography highlights
56
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
lighter than others in class (479 grams)
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
55
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-500 Sports photography info
Ricoh CX1 Sports photography info
37
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect AF
no liveview feature
continuous shooting slow (3.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (8 megapixels)
25
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of shutter priority mode
resolution not great (9MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-500
Travel photography with Ricoh CX1
52
lighter than others in class (479 grams)
has built in flash
does not have Timelapse function
low megapixels (8MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
59
flash built-in
quite wide (28mm)
resolution not great (9 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.3)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-500 Landscape photography details
Ricoh CX1 Landscape photography details
43
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
small screen (2.5")
no liveview feature
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (8 megapixels)
max ISO too low (400)
does not have Timelapse function
41
has manual focus
quite wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
no manual control
resolution not great (9MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-500
Vlogging with Ricoh CX1
9
no video recording
28
quite wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
display is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of mic support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Ricoh CX1
 Olympus E-500Ricoh CX1
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus E-500 Ricoh CX1
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-500 -
Type Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2005-10-21 2009-02-19
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 9 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Peak resolution 3264 x 2448 3456 x 2592
Highest native ISO 400 1600
Highest enhanced ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-200mm (7.1x)
Largest aperture - f/3.3-5.2
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Total lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.5 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 215 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 8 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 13.00 m (at ISO 100) 3.00 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 640x480
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 479 gr (1.06 lbs) 180 gr (0.40 lbs)
Physical dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID - DB-70
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse recording
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots One One
Cost at release $600 $299