Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh CX6
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
92 Imaging
34 Features
38 Overall
35
Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh CX6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Introduced October 2005
- Other Name is EVOLT E-500
- Replacement is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 201g - 104 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched November 2011
Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh CX6 Overview
Following is a in depth review of the Olympus E-500 versus Ricoh CX6, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the E-500 (8MP) and the CX6 (10MP) is relatively comparable but the E-500 (Four Thirds) and CX6 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-500 was launched 7 years before the CX6 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Ricoh CX6 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a complete comparison, here is a brief summation of how the E-500 matches up vs the CX6 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh CX6 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-500 & Ricoh CX6. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Ricoh CX6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Ricoh CX6
E-500 | CX6 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX6 over the Olympus E-500
CX6 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | November 2011 | October 2005 | More modern by 73 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 215k | Sharper screen (+1015k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Ricoh CX6
E-500 | CX6 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh CX6 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-500 provides physical measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) while the Ricoh CX6 has specifications of 104mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-500 versus Ricoh CX6 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have during that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-500 vs the CX6.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and CX6 is 70 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh CX6 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes only by going through specifications. The pic here should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-500 and CX6.
Plainly, both of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-500 because of its bigger sensor will make getting bokeh simpler and the Ricoh CX6 will show extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged E-500 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh CX6 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh CX6 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Ricoh CX6 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus E-500 | Ricoh CX6 |
Alternate name | EVOLT E-500 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2005-10-21 | 2011-11-15 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
Max enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 215k dot | 1,230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | - | Sony WhiteMagic VGA LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 479 grams (1.06 lbs) | 201 grams (0.44 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 104 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | DB-100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $600 | $595 |