Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh WG-4

Portability
70
Imaging
41
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Ricoh WG-4 front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41

Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Released October 2005
  • Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-500
  • Later Model is Olympus E-510
Ricoh WG-4
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
  • Released February 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview

The following is a in-depth overview of the Olympus E-500 and Ricoh WG-4, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and WG-4 (16MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and WG-4 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor measurements.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-500 was announced 9 years before the WG-4 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera.

Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-500 scores vs the WG-4 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Ricoh WG-4

 E-500 WG-4 

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Olympus E-500

 WG-4 E-500 
ReleasedFebruary 2014October 2005Newer by 100 months
Display dimensions3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k215kClearer display (+245k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Ricoh WG-4

 E-500 WG-4 
Manual focus More exact focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither provides Touch friendly display

Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison

If you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-500 provides outer dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 has proportions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-500 and Ricoh WG-4 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is a front view size comparison of the E-500 vs the WG-4.

Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh WG-4 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and WG-4 is 70 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh WG-4 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reading a spec sheet. The image underneath should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-500 and WG-4.

Clearly, both of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-500 using its larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Ricoh WG-4 will deliver greater detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-500 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh WG-4 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh WG-4 as a Portrait photography camera
48
focusing manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
no liveview feature
sensor resolution not great (8 megapixels)
41
you can focus manually
good resolution (16MP)
includes face detection focusing
no manual control
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 Street photography advice
Ricoh WG-4 Street photography advice
56
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
lighter than others (479g)
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
screen does not articulate
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-500 Sports photography info
Ricoh WG-4 Sports photography info
37
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect auto focus
no liveview feature
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (8 megapixels)
45
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
includes tracking autofocus
environment proofing
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames per second)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
not so great battery pack (240 shots)
no phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-500
Travel photography with Ricoh WG-4
52
lighter than others (479g)
flash built-in
lack of Time Lapse function
sensor resolution not great (8MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
72
environment proofing
good resolution (16MP)
built-in flash
fairly wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
not so great battery pack (240 shots)
display isn't selfie friendly
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-500 Landscape photography highlights
Ricoh WG-4 Landscape photography highlights
43
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
screen is small (2.5")
no liveview feature
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (8MP)
low maximum ISO (400)
lack of Time Lapse function
54
you can focus manually
fairly wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
environment proofing
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
not so great battery pack (240 per charge)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 Vlogging info
Ricoh WG-4 Vlogging info
9
can't record video
36
fairly wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
missing external microphone support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Ricoh WG-4
 Olympus E-500Ricoh WG-4
General Information
Brand Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus E-500 Ricoh WG-4
Also called as EVOLT E-500 -
Class Advanced DSLR Waterproof
Released 2005-10-21 2014-02-05
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 3264 x 2448 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 400 6400
Max enhanced ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 125
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-100mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.0-4.9
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.5 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 215k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 13.00 m (at ISO 100) 10.00 m (Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p)
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 479g (1.06 lb) 230g (0.51 lb)
Physical dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 240 photographs
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal
Card slots One One
Retail cost $600 $330