Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh WG-M1

Portability
70
Imaging
41
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Ricoh WG-M1 front
Portability
91
Imaging
38
Features
22
Overall
31

Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Revealed October 2005
  • Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-500
  • Later Model is Olympus E-510
Ricoh WG-M1
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 1.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 800
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
  • 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
  • Launched September 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview

Here is a thorough assessment of the Olympus E-500 and Ricoh WG-M1, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and WG-M1 (14MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and WG-M1 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor dimensions.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-500 was brought out 10 years before the WG-M1 and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera.

Before going straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the E-500 scores vs the WG-M1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Ricoh WG-M1

 E-500 WG-M1 
Manual focus Very precise focusing
Screen dimensions2.5"1.5"Bigger screen (+1")
Screen resolution215k115kSharper screen (+100k dot)

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Olympus E-500

 WG-M1 E-500 
LaunchedSeptember 2014October 2005Fresher by 108 months

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Ricoh WG-M1

 E-500 WG-M1 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch screen Neither contains Touch screen

Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison

If you are looking to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-500 has got outside dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-500 and Ricoh WG-M1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the E-500 versus the WG-M1.

Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh WG-M1 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and WG-M1 is 70 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh WG-M1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is very tough to envision the gap between sensor sizing merely by going over specifications. The visual here will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-500 and WG-M1.

Plainly, the 2 cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-500 because of its bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Ricoh WG-M1 will offer greater detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older E-500 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh WG-M1 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-500 Portrait photography details
Ricoh WG-M1 Portrait photography details
48
focusing manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
MP count low (8MP)
29
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
no manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-500
Street photography with Ricoh WG-M1
56
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
lighter than competition (479g)
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
52
weather sealing
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
low max ISO (800)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh WG-M1 as a Sports photography camera
37
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect AF
doesn't have liveview
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (8 megapixels)
37
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
weather sealing
great battery power (350 CIPA)
focal length is fixed ((1×)mm)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh WG-M1 as a Travel photography camera
52
lighter than competition (479 grams)
built-in flash
lack of Time Lapse recording
MP count low (8 megapixels)
does not feature selfie friendly display
64
great battery power (350 CIPA)
weather sealing
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
no Time Lapse mode
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh WG-M1 as a Landscape photography camera
43
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.5")
doesn't have liveview
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (8MP)
max ISO too low (400)
lack of Time Lapse recording
35
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
weather sealing
great battery power (350 per charge)
lack of manual focus
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed ((1×)mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
small screen (1.5 inch)
no manual mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
low max ISO (800)
no RAW support
no Time Lapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh WG-M1 as a Vlogging camera
9
no video
26
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
no external mic socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Ricoh WG-M1
 Olympus E-500Ricoh WG-M1
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus E-500 Ricoh WG-M1
Also Known as EVOLT E-500 -
Type Advanced DSLR Waterproof
Revealed 2005-10-21 2014-09-12
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3264 x 2448 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 400 800
Maximum boosted ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - (1×)
Maximum aperture - f/2.8
Amount of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5 inches 1.5 inches
Screen resolution 215k dots 115k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs -
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs -
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames per second 10.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 13.00 m (at ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 479g (1.06 lbs) 190g (0.42 lbs)
Physical dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 350 pictures
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery model - DB-65
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) -
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card microSD/microSDHC, internal
Card slots 1 1
Price at launch $600 $2,000