Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh WG-M1
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38


91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Revealed October 2005
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-500
- Later Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Launched September 2014

Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Here is a thorough assessment of the Olympus E-500 and Ricoh WG-M1, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and WG-M1 (14MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and WG-M1 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor dimensions.

The E-500 was brought out 10 years before the WG-M1 and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the E-500 scores vs the WG-M1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-500 and Ricoh WG-M1. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-500 Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Ricoh WG-M1
E-500 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Screen dimensions | 2.5" | ![]() | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1") |
Screen resolution | 215k | ![]() | 115k | Sharper screen (+100k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Olympus E-500
WG-M1 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2014 | ![]() | October 2005 | Fresher by 108 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Ricoh WG-M1
E-500 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-500 has got outside dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-500 and Ricoh WG-M1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the E-500 versus the WG-M1.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and WG-M1 is 70 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to envision the gap between sensor sizing merely by going over specifications. The visual here will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-500 and WG-M1.
Plainly, the 2 cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-500 because of its bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Ricoh WG-M1 will offer greater detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older E-500 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus E-500 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
Also Known as | EVOLT E-500 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2005-10-21 | 2014-09-12 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | (1×) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8 |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 1.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 215k dots | 115k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | - |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 479g (1.06 lbs) | 190g (0.42 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 pictures |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | DB-65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $600 | $2,000 |