Olympus E-500 vs Samsung HZ35W
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
91 Imaging
34 Features
42 Overall
37
Olympus E-500 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Revealed October 2005
- Also Known as EVOLT E-500
- Updated by Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Introduced June 2010
- Also referred to as WB650
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-500 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
The following is a comprehensive analysis of the Olympus E-500 versus Samsung HZ35W, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and HZ35W (12MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and HZ35W (1/2.3") posses different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-500 was brought out 5 years earlier than the HZ35W which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a short view of how the E-500 scores against the HZ35W in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-500 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-500 & Samsung HZ35W. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Samsung HZ35W
| E-500 | HZ35W |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Olympus E-500
| HZ35W | E-500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2010 | October 2005 | Newer by 56 months | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 614k | 215k | Crisper display (+399k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Samsung HZ35W
| E-500 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Olympus E-500 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-500 offers physical measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Samsung HZ35W has sizing of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-500 versus Samsung HZ35W in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Below is a front view size comparison of the E-500 and the HZ35W.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and HZ35W is 70 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-500 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by going through specifications. The picture underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-500 and HZ35W.
To sum up, both of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-500 featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Samsung HZ35W will provide extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-500 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus E-500 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus E-500 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Olympus E-500 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus E-500 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Alternate name | EVOLT E-500 | WB650 |
| Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2005-10-21 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
| Available lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 215 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 16 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 479 gr (1.06 lb) | 245 gr (0.54 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $600 | $300 |