Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Samsung HZ35W

Portability
70
Imaging
41
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Samsung HZ35W front
Portability
91
Imaging
34
Features
42
Overall
37

Olympus E-500 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Revealed October 2005
  • Also Known as EVOLT E-500
  • Updated by Olympus E-510
Samsung HZ35W
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
  • Introduced June 2010
  • Also referred to as WB650
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-500 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview

The following is a comprehensive analysis of the Olympus E-500 versus Samsung HZ35W, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and HZ35W (12MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and HZ35W (1/2.3") posses different sensor dimensions.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-500 was brought out 5 years earlier than the HZ35W which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.

Before getting into a full comparison, here is a short view of how the E-500 scores against the HZ35W in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Samsung HZ35W

 E-500 HZ35W 

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Olympus E-500

 HZ35W E-500 
IntroducedJune 2010October 2005Newer by 56 months
Display size3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution614k215kCrisper display (+399k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Samsung HZ35W

 E-500 HZ35W 
Focus manually More accurate focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch display Missing Touch display

Olympus E-500 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-500 offers physical measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Samsung HZ35W has sizing of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-500 versus Samsung HZ35W in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Below is a front view size comparison of the E-500 and the HZ35W.

Olympus E-500 vs Samsung HZ35W size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and HZ35W is 70 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Samsung HZ35W top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison

Typically, its tough to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by going through specifications. The picture underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-500 and HZ35W.

To sum up, both of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-500 featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Samsung HZ35W will provide extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-500 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus E-500 vs Samsung HZ35W sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-500 Portrait photography advice
Samsung HZ35W Portrait photography advice
48
manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
no liveview
megapixel count low (8MP)
33
you can focus manually
has face detect focusing
can't use external flash
low MP (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 Street photography highlights
Samsung HZ35W Street photography highlights
56
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than average in class (479 grams)
fixed screen
no image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
60
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (245g)
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-500 Sports photography details
Samsung HZ35W Sports photography details
37
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect autofocus
no liveview
max frames per second very slow (3.0 fps)
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (8MP)
42
incredible zoom range (24-360mm 15.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
has tracking focus
low MP (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-500 Travel photography details
Samsung HZ35W Travel photography details
52
lighter than average in class (479 grams)
has built in flash
does not have Timelapse function
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly display
63
lighter than competition (245g)
built-in flash
really wide (24mm)
great reach (360mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
low MP (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-500 Landscape photography highlights
Samsung HZ35W Landscape photography highlights
43
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
tiny screen (2.5 inches)
no liveview
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
max ISO too low (400)
does not have Timelapse function
42
you can focus manually
really wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
low MP (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
does not have Time Lapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-500
Vlogging with Samsung HZ35W
9
lack of video recording
31
really wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focusing
lighter than competition (245 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
screen is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have mic port
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-500 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Samsung HZ35W
 Olympus E-500Samsung HZ35W
General Information
Brand Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus E-500 Samsung HZ35W
Alternate name EVOLT E-500 WB650
Type Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2005-10-21 2010-06-16
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3264 x 2448 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 400 3200
Maximum boosted ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-360mm (15.0x)
Largest aperture - f/3.2-5.8
Macro focusing range - 3cm
Available lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.5 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 215 thousand dot 614 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 16 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 13.00 m (at ISO 100) 5.00 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 479 gr (1.06 lb) 245 gr (0.54 lb)
Physical dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID - SLB-11A
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Launch pricing $600 $300