Olympus E-500 vs Samsung MV800
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
97 Imaging
38 Features
43 Overall
40
Olympus E-500 vs Samsung MV800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Announced October 2005
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-500
- Successor is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 56 x 10mm
- Launched September 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-500 vs Samsung MV800 Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Olympus E-500 and Samsung MV800, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and MV800 (16MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and MV800 (1/2.3") posses different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-500 was revealed 6 years prior to the MV800 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung MV800 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a thorough comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-500 matches up vs the MV800 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-500 vs Samsung MV800 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-500 & Samsung MV800. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Samsung MV800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Samsung MV800
| E-500 | MV800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung MV800 over the Olympus E-500
| MV800 | E-500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2011 | October 2005 | Fresher by 71 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 215k | Clearer screen (+245k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Samsung MV800
| E-500 | MV800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Samsung MV800 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-500 has got outside dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) while the Samsung MV800 has specifications of 92mm x 56mm x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-500 and Samsung MV800 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the E-500 and the MV800.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and MV800 is 70 and 97 respectively.
Olympus E-500 vs Samsung MV800 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to visualize the difference in sensor sizing simply by seeing technical specs. The graphic underneath will give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-500 and MV800.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-500 with its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Samsung MV800 will show extra detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older E-500 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-500 vs Samsung MV800 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus E-500 vs Samsung MV800 Specifications
| Olympus E-500 | Samsung MV800 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus E-500 | Samsung MV800 |
| Also called | EVOLT E-500 | - |
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2005-10-21 | 2011-09-01 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Available lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 215k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320 x 240 (30/15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 479 gr (1.06 pounds) | 121 gr (0.27 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 92 x 56 x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | BP70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Micro SD |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $600 | $499 |