Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Samsung NX2000

Portability
70
Imaging
41
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Samsung NX2000 front
Portability
89
Imaging
62
Features
68
Overall
64

Olympus E-500 vs Samsung NX2000 Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Announced October 2005
  • Other Name is EVOLT E-500
  • Later Model is Olympus E-510
Samsung NX2000
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Samsung NX Mount
  • 228g - 119 x 65 x 36mm
  • Revealed November 2013
  • Old Model is Samsung NX1100
  • Refreshed by Samsung NX3000
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-500 vs Samsung NX2000 Overview

Following is a in depth assessment of the Olympus E-500 and Samsung NX2000, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There is a big difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and NX2000 (20MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and NX2000 (APS-C) feature totally different sensor measurements.

Photography Glossary

The E-500 was launched 9 years prior to the NX2000 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung NX2000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the E-500 grades vs the NX2000 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Samsung NX2000

 E-500 NX2000 

Reasons to pick Samsung NX2000 over the Olympus E-500

 NX2000 E-500 
RevealedNovember 2013October 2005More modern by 98 months
Display sizing3.7"2.5"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution1152k215kSharper display (+937k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Samsung NX2000

 E-500 NX2000 
Manually focus Very exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen

Olympus E-500 vs Samsung NX2000 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to carry around your camera, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-500 has got external dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Samsung NX2000 has proportions of 119mm x 65mm x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") along with a weight of 228 grams (0.50 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-500 and Samsung NX2000 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the E-500 and the NX2000.

Olympus E-500 vs Samsung NX2000 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and NX2000 is 70 and 89 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Samsung NX2000 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Samsung NX2000 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is very hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes simply by researching technical specs. The pic here might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-500 and NX2000.

As you can tell, both of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-500 featuring a smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh tougher and the Samsung NX2000 will result in extra detail utilizing its extra 12MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged E-500 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-500 vs Samsung NX2000 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Samsung NX2000 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Samsung NX2000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-500 Portrait photography information
Samsung NX2000 Portrait photography information
48
focusing manually
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
low megapixels (8 megapixels)
77
has manual focus
decent MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
offers face detection focus
supports RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 Street photography info
Samsung NX2000 Street photography info
56
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
lighter than others (479g)
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
77
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW files
features focus via touch
lighter than competition (228g)
above average high ISO (25,600)
no moving screen
no image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-500 Sports photography information
Samsung NX2000 Sports photography information
37
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
has phase detect auto focus
doesn't have liveview
continuous shooting slow (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (8 megapixels)
61
decent MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
offers tracking autofocus
no image stabilization
does not have phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-500 Travel photography advice
Samsung NX2000 Travel photography advice
52
lighter than others (479g)
built-in flash
no Timelapse recording
low megapixels (8MP)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
72
lighter than competition (228g)
features focus via touch
decent MP (20 megapixels)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-500 Landscape photography factors
Samsung NX2000 Landscape photography factors
43
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
screen is small (2.5 inch)
doesn't have liveview
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (8 megapixels)
low max ISO (400)
no Timelapse recording
72
has manual focus
change lenses (Samsung NX mount)
lovely big screen (3.7 inch)
decent MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
above average high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW files
no image stabilization
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 Vlogging highlights
Samsung NX2000 Vlogging highlights
9
can't shoot video
35
touch screen
offers face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition (228g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
doesn't have external mic socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-500 vs Samsung NX2000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Samsung NX2000
 Olympus E-500Samsung NX2000
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus E-500 Samsung NX2000
Also called EVOLT E-500 -
Type Advanced DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Announced 2005-10-21 2013-11-30
Physical type Mid-size SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3264 x 2448 5472 x 3648
Highest native ISO 400 25600
Highest enhanced ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 3 21
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds Samsung NX
Amount of lenses 45 32
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.5 inches 3.7 inches
Screen resolution 215k dots 1,152k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 30s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames per sec 8.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 13.00 m (at ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180s 1/180s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - MPEG-4, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None Optional
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 479 grams (1.06 lbs) 228 grams (0.50 lbs)
Dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 119 x 65 x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 75
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.4
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.3
DXO Low light score not tested 908
Other
Battery life - 340 images
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - BP1130
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) -
Time lapse recording
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card MicroSD/ MicroSDHC/ MicroSDXC
Card slots Single Single
Launch cost $600 $599