Olympus E-500 vs Samsung NX2000
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
89 Imaging
62 Features
68 Overall
64
Olympus E-500 vs Samsung NX2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Announced October 2005
- Other Name is EVOLT E-500
- Later Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 228g - 119 x 65 x 36mm
- Revealed November 2013
- Old Model is Samsung NX1100
- Refreshed by Samsung NX3000
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-500 vs Samsung NX2000 Overview
Following is a in depth assessment of the Olympus E-500 and Samsung NX2000, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There is a big difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and NX2000 (20MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and NX2000 (APS-C) feature totally different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe E-500 was launched 9 years prior to the NX2000 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung NX2000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the E-500 grades vs the NX2000 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-500 vs Samsung NX2000 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-500 and Samsung NX2000. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-500 Gallery and Samsung NX2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Samsung NX2000
| E-500 | NX2000 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX2000 over the Olympus E-500
| NX2000 | E-500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | November 2013 | October 2005 | More modern by 98 months | |
| Display sizing | 3.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
| Display resolution | 1152k | 215k | Sharper display (+937k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Samsung NX2000
| E-500 | NX2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Samsung NX2000 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-500 has got external dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Samsung NX2000 has proportions of 119mm x 65mm x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") along with a weight of 228 grams (0.50 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-500 and Samsung NX2000 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the E-500 and the NX2000.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and NX2000 is 70 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-500 vs Samsung NX2000 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes simply by researching technical specs. The pic here might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-500 and NX2000.
As you can tell, both of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-500 featuring a smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh tougher and the Samsung NX2000 will result in extra detail utilizing its extra 12MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged E-500 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-500 vs Samsung NX2000 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus E-500 vs Samsung NX2000 Specifications
| Olympus E-500 | Samsung NX2000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus E-500 | Samsung NX2000 |
| Also called | EVOLT E-500 | - |
| Type | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2005-10-21 | 2013-11-30 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Highest native ISO | 400 | 25600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 21 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Samsung NX |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | 32 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inches | 3.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 215k dots | 1,152k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/180s | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 479 grams (1.06 lbs) | 228 grams (0.50 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 119 x 65 x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 75 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 908 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 images |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | BP1130 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC/ MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $600 | $599 |