Olympus E-500 vs Sigma DP2x
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
86 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Olympus E-500 vs Sigma DP2x Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Released October 2005
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-500
- Replacement is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 320 x 240 video
- 41mm (F) lens
- 280g - 113 x 60 x 56mm
- Released February 2011
- Replaced the Sigma DP2s
Photography Glossary Olympus E-500 vs Sigma DP2x Overview
Lets look much closer at the Olympus E-500 versus Sigma DP2x, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sigma. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and DP2x (5MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and DP2x (APS-C) offer different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-500 was introduced 6 years before the DP2x which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sigma DP2x being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the E-500 grades versus the DP2x for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-500 vs Sigma DP2x Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-500 & Sigma DP2x. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Sigma DP2x Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Sigma DP2x
| E-500 | DP2x |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2x over the Olympus E-500
| DP2x | E-500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2011 | October 2005 | Newer by 64 months | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 215k | Crisper screen (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Sigma DP2x
| E-500 | DP2x | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 2.5" | 2.5" | Same screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Sigma DP2x Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-500 enjoys outside measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Sigma DP2x has specifications of 113mm x 60mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") along with a weight of 280 grams (0.62 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-500 versus Sigma DP2x in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the E-500 versus the DP2x.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and DP2x is 70 and 86 respectively.
Olympus E-500 vs Sigma DP2x Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to picture the gap between sensor dimensions merely by going over technical specs. The image underneath will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-500 and DP2x.
As you have seen, both of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-500 with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Olympus E-500 will offer greater detail using its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged E-500 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-500 vs Sigma DP2x Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus E-500 vs Sigma DP2x Specifications
| Olympus E-500 | Sigma DP2x | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model | Olympus E-500 | Sigma DP2x |
| Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-500 | - |
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Large Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2005-10-21 | 2011-02-08 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | True II |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 5 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 2640 x 1760 |
| Highest native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 41mm (1x) |
| Number of lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 215 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 15 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.30 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Forced Flash, Red-Eye Reduction, Slow Synchro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 320 x 240 |
| Highest video resolution | None | 320x240 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 479 gr (1.06 lbs) | 280 gr (0.62 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 113 x 60 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/MMC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $600 | $699 |