Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill

Portability
70
Imaging
41
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Sigma SD1 Merrill front
Portability
57
Imaging
56
Features
45
Overall
51

Olympus E-500 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Introduced October 2005
  • Other Name is EVOLT E-500
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-510
Sigma SD1 Merrill
(Full Review)
  • 15MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
  • Launched April 2012
  • Older Model is Sigma SD1
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-500 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview

Here is a complete review of the Olympus E-500 and Sigma SD1 Merrill, both Advanced DSLR cameras by rivals Olympus and Sigma. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and SD1 Merrill (15MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) provide different sensor sizes.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-500 was introduced 7 years earlier than the SD1 Merrill and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Mid-size SLR).

Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the E-500 matches up against the SD1 Merrill when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Sigma SD1 Merrill

 E-500 SD1 Merrill 

Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Olympus E-500

 SD1 Merrill E-500 
LaunchedApril 2012October 2005Fresher by 78 months
Display dimensions3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k215kClearer display (+245k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Sigma SD1 Merrill

 E-500 SD1 Merrill 
Manually focus Very exact focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch display Neither contains Touch display

Olympus E-500 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to carry your camera often, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-500 has got physical dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Sigma SD1 Merrill has proportions of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") with a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-500 and Sigma SD1 Merrill in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is a front view size comparison of the E-500 vs the SD1 Merrill.

Olympus E-500 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and SD1 Merrill is 70 and 57 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison

Usually, it's hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizing only by going through technical specs. The visual below will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-500 and SD1 Merrill.

As you can tell, the two cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-500 having a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Sigma SD1 Merrill will produce extra detail using its extra 7MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older E-500 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-500 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-500 Portrait photography information
Sigma SD1 Merrill Portrait photography information
48
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
no liveview feature
resolution not great (8MP)
65
has manual focus
resolution is good (15 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
no liveview feature
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 Street photography details
Sigma SD1 Merrill Street photography details
56
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
lighter than average in class (479g)
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
57
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
environment sealing
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-500 Sports photography information
Sigma SD1 Merrill Sports photography information
37
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect AF
no liveview feature
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (8 megapixels)
61
resolution is good (15 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
environment sealing
has phase detect AF
no liveview feature
does not have image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Travel photography camera
Sigma SD1 Merrill as a Travel photography camera
52
lighter than average in class (479g)
built-in flash
no Time Lapse recording
resolution not great (8MP)
display is not selfie friendly
54
environment sealing
resolution is good (15MP)
no Timelapse recording
does not have a selfie friendly display
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-500 Landscape photography highlights
Sigma SD1 Merrill Landscape photography highlights
43
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
small screen (2.5 inch)
no liveview feature
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (8 megapixels)
maximum ISO low (400)
no Time Lapse recording
63
has manual focus
switch lenses (Sigma SA mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
resolution is good (15 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
environment sealing
no liveview feature
does not have image stabilization
no Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 Vlogging features
Sigma SD1 Merrill Vlogging features
9
can't shoot video
9
can't shoot video
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-500 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Sigma SD1 Merrill
 Olympus E-500Sigma SD1 Merrill
General Information
Company Olympus Sigma
Model type Olympus E-500 Sigma SD1 Merrill
Also called EVOLT E-500 -
Class Advanced DSLR Advanced DSLR
Introduced 2005-10-21 2012-04-10
Physical type Mid-size SLR Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Powered by - Dual True II
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 24 x 16mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 384.0mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 15MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Peak resolution 3264 x 2448 4800 x 3200
Highest native ISO 400 6400
Highest enhanced ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds Sigma SA
Number of lenses 45 76
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.5" 3"
Display resolution 215k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 96 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x 0.64x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds -
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds -
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 13.00 m (at ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye no built-in flash
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Highest video resolution None None
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 479 grams (1.06 lb) 790 grams (1.74 lb)
Physical dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible)
Card slots One One
Retail pricing $600 $2,339