Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Sigma SD10

Portability
70
Imaging
41
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Sigma SD10 front
Portability
54
Imaging
39
Features
27
Overall
34

Olympus E-500 vs Sigma SD10 Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Introduced October 2005
  • Alternate Name is EVOLT E-500
  • Replacement is Olympus E-510
Sigma SD10
(Full Review)
  • 3MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 800 (Boost to 1600)
  • 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
  • No Video
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
  • Introduced March 2004
  • Earlier Model is Sigma SD9
  • Later Model is Sigma SD14
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-500 vs Sigma SD10 Overview

Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-500 versus Sigma SD10, both Advanced DSLR cameras by companies Olympus and Sigma. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and SD10 (3MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and SD10 (APS-C) offer different sensor size.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-500 was revealed 20 months later than the SD10 making them a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras have the same body design (Mid-size SLR).

Before delving into a complete comparison, here is a short highlight of how the E-500 scores versus the SD10 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Sigma SD10

 E-500 SD10 
IntroducedOctober 2005March 2004More recent by 20 months
Display dimensions2.5"1.8"Larger display (+0.7")
Display resolution215k130kSharper display (+85k dot)

Reasons to pick Sigma SD10 over the Olympus E-500

 SD10 E-500 

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Sigma SD10

 E-500 SD10 
Focus manually More accurate focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch display Missing Touch display

Olympus E-500 vs Sigma SD10 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to lug around your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-500 has outside dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD10 has specifications of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") with a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-500 versus Sigma SD10 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the E-500 and the SD10.

Olympus E-500 vs Sigma SD10 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and SD10 is 70 and 54 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Sigma SD10 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Sigma SD10 Sensor Comparison

Often, it's hard to imagine the difference in sensor measurements merely by viewing specifications. The visual here might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-500 and SD10.

To sum up, both cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-500 with its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field trickier and the Olympus E-500 will result in extra detail because of its extra 5MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more recent E-500 provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-500 vs Sigma SD10 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Sigma SD10 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Sigma SD10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-500 Portrait photography factors
Sigma SD10 Portrait photography factors
48
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
no liveview feature
low resolution sensor (8MP)
47
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW files
doesn't have liveview
low megapixels (3 megapixels)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Street photography camera
Sigma SD10 as a Street photography camera
56
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
lighter than competition in class (479g)
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
43
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW files
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
heavier than competition in class (950g)
maximum ISO low (800)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Sports photography camera
Sigma SD10 as a Sports photography camera
37
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect auto focus
no liveview feature
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
low resolution sensor (8MP)
36
max shutter speed is good (1/6,000 seconds)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
doesn't have liveview
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (3MP)
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-500 Travel photography information
Sigma SD10 Travel photography information
52
lighter than competition in class (479 grams)
built-in flash
missing Timelapse recording
low resolution sensor (8MP)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
29
does not have Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition in class (950 grams)
low megapixels (3MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-500 Landscape photography info
Sigma SD10 Landscape photography info
43
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen is small (2.5 inches)
no liveview feature
no image stabilization
low resolution sensor (8MP)
maximum ISO low (400)
missing Timelapse recording
41
has manual focus
swap lenses (Sigma SA mount)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW files
small screen (1.8 inch)
doesn't have liveview
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (3MP)
maximum ISO low (800)
does not have Time Lapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 Vlogging details
Sigma SD10 Vlogging details
9
no video shooting
9
no video
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-500 vs Sigma SD10 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Sigma SD10
 Olympus E-500Sigma SD10
General Information
Company Olympus Sigma
Model Olympus E-500 Sigma SD10
Also called EVOLT E-500 -
Category Advanced DSLR Advanced DSLR
Introduced 2005-10-21 2004-03-19
Physical type Mid-size SLR Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 20.7 x 13.8mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 285.7mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 3MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2
Highest resolution 3264 x 2448 2268 x 1512
Highest native ISO 400 800
Highest boosted ISO 1600 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds Sigma SA
Amount of lenses 45 76
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.7
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5 inches 1.8 inches
Screen resolution 215 thousand dots 130 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage 95% 98%
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x 0.77x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/6000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 13.00 m (at ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180 seconds 1/180 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Highest video resolution None None
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 479g (1.06 lb) 950g (2.09 lb)
Physical dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card Compact Flash Type I or II
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $600 $198