Olympus E-500 vs Sony A7R III
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
63 Imaging
78 Features
93 Overall
84
Olympus E-500 vs Sony A7R III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Announced October 2005
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-500
- Later Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 42MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Increase to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 657g - 127 x 96 x 74mm
- Launched October 2017
- Succeeded the Sony A7R II
- Refreshed by Sony A7R IV
Olympus E-500 vs Sony A7R III Overview
Below is a extensive analysis of the Olympus E-500 versus Sony A7R III, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Pro Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and A7R III (42MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and A7R III (Full frame) feature different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-500 was unveiled 13 years earlier than the A7R III and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony A7R III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the E-500 scores vs the A7R III with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-500 vs Sony A7R III Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-500 & Sony Alpha A7R III. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Sony A7R III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Sony A7R III
E-500 | A7R III |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A7R III over the Olympus E-500
A7R III | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2017 | October 2005 | More recent by 146 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 1440k | 215k | Clearer display (+1225k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Sony A7R III
E-500 | A7R III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Sony A7R III Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-500 has external measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Sony A7R III has proportions of 127mm x 96mm x 74mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.9") with a weight of 657 grams (1.45 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-500 versus Sony A7R III in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-500 against the A7R III.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and A7R III is 70 and 63 respectively.
Olympus E-500 vs Sony A7R III Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to picture the contrast between sensor measurements only by reviewing a spec sheet. The photograph here should offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-500 and A7R III.
As you can see, both of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-500 having a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF harder and the Sony A7R III will deliver extra detail having an extra 34 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older E-500 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus E-500 vs Sony A7R III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-500 vs Sony A7R III Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Sony Alpha A7R III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus E-500 | Sony Alpha A7R III |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-500 | - |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Pro Mirrorless |
Announced | 2005-10-21 | 2017-10-25 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 42 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 7952 x 5304 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 32000 |
Max boosted ISO | 1600 | 102400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
Number of lenses | 45 | 121 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 215k dot | 1,440k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 3,686k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Off, Auto, Fill-flash, Slow Sync, Rear Sync, Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1(5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 479g (1.06 lbs) | 657g (1.45 lbs) |
Dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 127 x 96 x 74mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 100 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 26.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 14.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 3523 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 650 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FZ100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Two SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II support on one) |
Storage slots | Single | Two |
Pricing at launch | $600 | $2,800 |