Olympus E-500 vs Sony A9
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
65 Imaging
72 Features
93 Overall
80
Olympus E-500 vs Sony A9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Introduced October 2005
- Other Name is EVOLT E-500
- Successor is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Raise to 204800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 673g - 127 x 96 x 63mm
- Launched April 2017
- Newer Model is Sony A9 II
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-500 vs Sony A9 Overview
Following is a extended assessment of the Olympus E-500 versus Sony A9, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Pro Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and A9 (24MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and A9 (Full frame) boast totally different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-500 was launched 12 years before the A9 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony A9 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-500 matches up versus the A9 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-500 vs Sony A9 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-500 and Sony Alpha A9. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-500 Gallery and Sony A9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Sony A9
| E-500 | A9 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony A9 over the Olympus E-500
| A9 | E-500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | April 2017 | October 2005 | More modern by 139 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 1440k | 215k | Crisper display (+1225k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Sony A9
| E-500 | A9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Sony A9 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-500 has got outer measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Sony A9 has sizing of 127mm x 96mm x 63mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.5") and a weight of 673 grams (1.48 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-500 versus Sony A9 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the E-500 compared to the A9.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and A9 is 70 and 65 respectively.
Olympus E-500 vs Sony A9 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to see the gap in sensor sizes merely by viewing specifications. The image underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-500 and A9.
Plainly, each of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-500 because of its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Sony A9 will result in greater detail utilizing its extra 16MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-500 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus E-500 vs Sony A9 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus E-500 vs Sony A9 Specifications
| Olympus E-500 | Sony Alpha A9 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus E-500 | Sony Alpha A9 |
| Alternate name | EVOLT E-500 | - |
| Class | Advanced DSLR | Pro Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2005-10-21 | 2017-04-19 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | BIONZ X |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 35.6 x 23.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 847.3mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 400 | 51200 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | 204800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | - | 50 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 693 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
| Available lenses | 45 | 121 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 215k dots | 1,440k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 3,686k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | 0.78x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
| Highest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 20.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync., Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Maximum video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 479 gr (1.06 pounds) | 673 gr (1.48 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 127 x 96 x 63mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 92 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 24.9 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 3517 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 650 images |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-FZ100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs + continuous) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II compatible) |
| Card slots | Single | 2 |
| Price at launch | $600 | $4,498 |