Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Sony A290

Portability
70
Imaging
41
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 front
Portability
66
Imaging
54
Features
47
Overall
51

Olympus E-500 vs Sony A290 Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Released October 2005
  • Also referred to as EVOLT E-500
  • Renewed by Olympus E-510
Sony A290
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
  • Launched June 2010
  • Superseded the Sony A230
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-500 vs Sony A290 Overview

Here, we are matching up the Olympus E-500 vs Sony A290, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and A290 (14MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and A290 (APS-C) boast different sensor dimensions.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-500 was revealed 5 years before the A290 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony A290 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before getting right into a complete comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-500 matches up versus the A290 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Sony A290

 E-500 A290 

Reasons to pick Sony A290 over the Olympus E-500

 A290 E-500 
LaunchedJune 2010October 2005More modern by 56 months
Display size2.7"2.5"Larger display (+0.2")
Display resolution230k215kCrisper display (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Sony A290

 E-500 A290 
Manually focus More exact focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither comes with Touch friendly display

Olympus E-500 vs Sony A290 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to carry around your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-500 comes with external dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Sony A290 has measurements of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") with a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-500 vs Sony A290 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using during that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the E-500 compared to the A290.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony A290 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-500 and A290 is 70 and 66 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony A290 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Sony A290 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is very tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes simply by looking through specs. The image below might give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-500 and A290.

As you can plainly see, both cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-500 with its smaller sensor is going to make shooting bokeh more challenging and the Sony A290 will provide you with more detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-500 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony A290 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Sony A290 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Sony A290 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-500 Portrait photography advice
Sony A290 Portrait photography advice
48
manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
no liveview
resolution not great (8MP)
65
you can focus manually
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
has face detect autofocus
saves RAW files
doesn't have liveview
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-500
Street photography with Sony A290
56
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
lighter than competition in class (479 grams)
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
66
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW files
screen is fixed
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-500 Sports photography highlights
Sony A290 Sports photography highlights
37
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect auto focus
no liveview
continuous shooting slow (3.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
resolution not great (8 megapixels)
55
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
comes with phase detect autofocus
doesn't have liveview
low fps (3.0 frames per second)
bad battery (290 shots)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-500 Travel photography features
Sony A290 Travel photography features
52
lighter than competition in class (479 grams)
flash built-in
does not have Time Lapse function
resolution not great (8 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
53
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
no Time Lapse function
bad battery (290 per charge)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-500 Landscape photography factors
Sony A290 Landscape photography factors
43
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen is small (2.5 inches)
no liveview
does not have image stabilization
resolution not great (8 megapixels)
low max ISO (400)
does not have Time Lapse function
58
you can focus manually
change lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW files
screen is small (2.7 inch)
doesn't have liveview
bad battery (290 per charge)
no Time Lapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-500
Vlogging with Sony A290
9
can't record video
9
lack of video recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-500 vs Sony A290 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Sony A290
 Olympus E-500Sony Alpha DSLR-A290
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-500 Sony Alpha DSLR-A290
Also referred to as EVOLT E-500 -
Class Advanced DSLR Entry-Level DSLR
Released 2005-10-21 2010-06-09
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3264 x 2448 4592 x 3056
Max native ISO 400 3200
Max boosted ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Available lenses 45 143
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 215k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x 0.55x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 13.00 m (at ISO 100) 10.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180 secs 1/160 secs
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Max video resolution None None
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 479g (1.06 pounds) 549g (1.21 pounds)
Physical dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 66
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.6
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.5
DXO Low light score not tested 615
Other
Battery life - 290 photos
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - NP-FH50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo, SD/SDHC
Storage slots 1 1
Launch price $600 $600