Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Sony A900

Portability
70
Imaging
42
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 front
Portability
54
Imaging
67
Features
62
Overall
65

Olympus E-500 vs Sony A900 Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Introduced October 2005
  • Alternative Name is EVOLT E-500
  • Replacement is Olympus E-510
Sony A900
(Full Review)
  • 25MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
  • Launched October 2008
  • Replacement is Sony A99
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-500 vs Sony A900 Overview

Let's examine more in depth at the Olympus E-500 versus Sony A900, both Advanced DSLR cameras by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and A900 (25MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and A900 (Full frame) possess totally different sensor dimensions.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-500 was introduced 4 years earlier than the A900 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Mid-size SLR).

Before delving through a complete comparison, below is a concise summation of how the E-500 grades versus the A900 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Sony A900

 E-500 A900 

Reasons to pick Sony A900 over the Olympus E-500

 A900 E-500 
LaunchedOctober 2008October 2005More recent by 36 months
Display dimension3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution922k215kSharper display (+707k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Sony A900

 E-500 A900 
Manual focus More precise focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lacking Touch friendly display

Olympus E-500 vs Sony A900 Physical Comparison

In case you're looking to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-500 comes with physical measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Sony A900 has proportions of 156mm x 117mm x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") and a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-500 versus Sony A900 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the E-500 versus the A900.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony A900 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and A900 is 70 and 54 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony A900 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Sony A900 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is hard to visualise the gap in sensor measurements merely by going through specs. The graphic here should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-500 and A900.

All in all, the two cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-500 using its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field harder and the Sony A900 will provide greater detail using its extra 17 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older E-500 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony A900 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Sony A900 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Sony A900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-500 Portrait photography highlights
Sony A900 Portrait photography highlights
49
focusing manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
resolution not great (8 megapixels)
72
has manual focus
amazing MP (25 megapixels)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
saves RAW files
no liveview
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 Street photography factors
Sony A900 Street photography factors
57
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
lighter than competition in class (479 grams)
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
66
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
saves RAW files
weather proofing
screen is fixed
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-500 Sports photography advice
Sony A900 Sports photography advice
37
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect auto focus
doesn't have liveview
max frames per second very slow (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (8 megapixels)
71
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
amazing MP (25 megapixels)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
weather proofing
has phase detect AF
no liveview
max fps low (5.0 frames per second)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Travel photography camera
Sony A900 as a Travel photography camera
52
lighter than competition in class (479g)
built-in flash
lack of Time Lapse mode
resolution not great (8MP)
display is not selfie friendly
55
weather proofing
amazing MP (25 megapixels)
does not have Timelapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-500 Landscape photography highlights
Sony A900 Landscape photography highlights
43
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inches)
doesn't have liveview
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (8 megapixels)
maximum ISO low (400)
lack of Time Lapse mode
73
has manual focus
swap lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
nice screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based)
amazing MP (25 megapixels)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
saves RAW files
weather proofing
two card slots
no liveview
does not have Timelapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-500
Vlogging with Sony A900
9
can't shoot video
9
can't shoot video
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-500 vs Sony A900 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Sony A900
 Olympus E-500Sony Alpha DSLR-A900
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-500 Sony Alpha DSLR-A900
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-500 -
Type Advanced DSLR Advanced DSLR
Introduced 2005-10-21 2008-10-22
Physical type Mid-size SLR Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Chip - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Full frame
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 35.9 x 24mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 861.6mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 25 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3264 x 2448 6048 x 4032
Highest native ISO 400 6400
Highest boosted ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Amount of lenses 45 143
Crop factor 2.1 1
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 215k dots 922k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech - TFT Xtra Fine color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x 0.74x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/8000s
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames per second 5.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 13.00 m (at ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180s 1/250s
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Highest video resolution None None
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 479 grams (1.06 lbs) 895 grams (1.97 lbs)
Dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 79
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.7
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.3
DXO Low light score not tested 1431
Other
Battery life - 880 pictures
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - NP-FM500H
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32
Card slots One Dual
Pricing at launch $600 $2,736