Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-C3

Portability
70
Imaging
41
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Sony Alpha NEX-C3 front
Portability
91
Imaging
56
Features
57
Overall
56

Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-C3 Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Introduced October 2005
  • Alternative Name is EVOLT E-500
  • Updated by Olympus E-510
Sony NEX-C3
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 225g - 110 x 60 x 33mm
  • Launched August 2011
  • Previous Model is Sony NEX-3
  • Newer Model is Sony NEX-F3
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-C3 Overview

Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-C3, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and NEX-C3 (16MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and NEX-C3 (APS-C) use different sensor sizing.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-500 was released 6 years before the NEX-C3 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony NEX-C3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summation of how the E-500 matches up against the NEX-C3 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Sony NEX-C3

 E-500 NEX-C3 

Reasons to pick Sony NEX-C3 over the Olympus E-500

 NEX-C3 E-500 
LaunchedAugust 2011October 2005Newer by 71 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display sizing3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution920k215kCrisper display (+705k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Sony NEX-C3

 E-500 NEX-C3 
Focus manually Dial accurate focusing
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch display Missing Touch display

Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-C3 Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-500 enjoys outer dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) while the Sony NEX-C3 has dimensions of 110mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-C3 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the E-500 against the NEX-C3.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-C3 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and NEX-C3 is 70 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-C3 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-C3 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it can be difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions only by going over specifications. The pic here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-500 and NEX-C3.

Plainly, the 2 cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-500 because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more challenging and the Sony NEX-C3 will deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images far more aggressively. The more aged E-500 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-C3 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony NEX-C3 as a Portrait photography camera
48
focusing manually
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
no liveview feature
low resolution sensor (8 megapixels)
73
has manual focus
resolution is good (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 Street photography information
Sony NEX-C3 Street photography information
56
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than average in class (479g)
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
79
tilting screen
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW files
lighter than competition (225g)
does not have image stabilization
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-500 Sports photography factors
Sony NEX-C3 Sports photography factors
37
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect AF
no liveview feature
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
low resolution sensor (8MP)
53
resolution is good (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
great battery (400 per charge)
low frames per second (6.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
lack of phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-500 Travel photography highlights
Sony NEX-C3 Travel photography highlights
52
lighter than average in class (479 grams)
built-in flash
doesn't have Timelapse recording
low resolution sensor (8 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
71
great battery (400 CIPA)
lighter than competition (225g)
resolution is good (16MP)
no Time Lapse recording
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-500
Landscape photography with Sony NEX-C3
43
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
screen is small (2.5 inches)
no liveview feature
does not have image stabilization
low resolution sensor (8 megapixels)
low maximum ISO (400)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
70
has manual focus
switch lenses (Sony E mount)
pretty good screen size (3")
resolution is good (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW files
great battery (400 shots)
does not have image stabilization
no Time Lapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 Vlogging details
Sony NEX-C3 Vlogging details
9
no video
27
lighter than competition (225g)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external mic support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-C3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Sony NEX-C3
 Olympus E-500Sony Alpha NEX-C3
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-500 Sony Alpha NEX-C3
Also Known as EVOLT E-500 -
Category Advanced DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Introduced 2005-10-21 2011-08-22
Physical type Mid-size SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.4 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 365.0mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3264 x 2448 4912 x 3264
Highest native ISO 400 12800
Highest boosted ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 3 25
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds Sony E
Amount of lenses 45 121
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display size 2.5 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 215k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display technology - TFT Xtra Fine LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 3.0fps 6.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 13.00 m (at ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180 secs 1/160 secs
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - MPEG-4
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 479 grams (1.06 pounds) 225 grams (0.50 pounds)
Dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 110 x 60 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 73
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.7
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.2
DXO Low light score not tested 1083
Other
Battery life - 400 photographs
Battery style - Battery Pack
Battery model - NPFW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots 1 1
Retail price $600 $343