Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-F3

Portability
70
Imaging
41
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Sony Alpha NEX-F3 front
Portability
86
Imaging
57
Features
60
Overall
58

Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-F3 Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Revealed October 2005
  • Also Known as EVOLT E-500
  • Updated by Olympus E-510
Sony NEX-F3
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 314g - 117 x 67 x 42mm
  • Announced August 2012
  • Earlier Model is Sony NEX-C3
  • Newer Model is Sony NEX-3N
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-F3 Overview

Let's look much closer at the Olympus E-500 versus Sony NEX-F3, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and NEX-F3 (16MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and NEX-F3 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor size.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-500 was released 7 years prior to the NEX-F3 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony NEX-F3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a concise summary of how the E-500 matches up vs the NEX-F3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Sony NEX-F3

 E-500 NEX-F3 

Reasons to pick Sony NEX-F3 over the Olympus E-500

 NEX-F3 E-500 
AnnouncedAugust 2012October 2005More recent by 83 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display size3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution920k215kSharper display (+705k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Sony NEX-F3

 E-500 NEX-F3 
Focus manually Dial precise focusing
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lack of Touch friendly display

Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-F3 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-500 enjoys outside dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") having a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-F3 has sizing of 117mm x 67mm x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 314 grams (0.69 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-500 versus Sony NEX-F3 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the E-500 against the NEX-F3.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-F3 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-500 and NEX-F3 is 70 and 86 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-F3 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-F3 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's tough to see the difference in sensor measurements only by seeing specs. The photograph here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-500 and NEX-F3.

All in all, each of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-500 because of its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field tougher and the Sony NEX-F3 will produce greater detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older E-500 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-F3 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-500 Portrait photography advice
Sony NEX-F3 Portrait photography advice
48
has manual focus
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
no liveview
low megapixels (8MP)
74
you can focus manually
decent MP (16MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 Street photography info
Sony NEX-F3 Street photography info
56
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
lighter than competition (479g)
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
76
has a tilting screen
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
lack of image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Sports photography camera
Sony NEX-F3 as a Sports photography camera
37
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect AF
no liveview
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (8MP)
53
decent MP (16MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
good battery power (470 CIPA)
slow frames per second (6.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
has no phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-500
Travel photography with Sony NEX-F3
52
lighter than competition (479g)
has built in flash
no Timelapse recording
low megapixels (8 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
69
good battery power (470 shots)
decent MP (16MP)
built-in flash
no Time Lapse mode
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-500 Landscape photography highlights
Sony NEX-F3 Landscape photography highlights
43
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
small screen (2.5 inches)
no liveview
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (8 megapixels)
low maximum ISO (400)
no Timelapse recording
70
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Sony E mount)
pretty good screen size (3")
decent MP (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
good battery power (470 CIPA)
lack of image stabilization
no Time Lapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 Vlogging highlights
Sony NEX-F3 Vlogging highlights
9
can't shoot video
27
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
no mic port
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-F3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Sony NEX-F3
 Olympus E-500Sony Alpha NEX-F3
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-500 Sony Alpha NEX-F3
Also referred to as EVOLT E-500 -
Type Advanced DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Revealed 2005-10-21 2012-08-16
Body design Mid-size SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.4 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 365.0mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3264 x 2448 4912 x 3264
Max native ISO 400 16000
Max boosted ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 200
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 3 25
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds Sony E
Total lenses 45 121
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen diagonal 2.5 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 215k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen technology - TFT Xtra Fine LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames/s 6.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 13.00 m (at ISO 100) -
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180 secs 1/160 secs
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 479g (1.06 pounds) 314g (0.69 pounds)
Physical dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 117 x 67 x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 73
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.7
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.3
DXO Low light rating not tested 1114
Other
Battery life - 470 photos
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NPFW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots Single Single
Price at launch $600 $470