Olympus E-500 vs Sony HX1
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
67 Imaging
32 Features
36 Overall
33
Olympus E-500 vs Sony HX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Introduced October 2005
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-500
- Later Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1440 x 1080 video
- 28-560mm (F2.8-5.2) lens
- 544g - 115 x 83 x 92mm
- Revealed April 2009
Olympus E-500 vs Sony HX1 Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-500 versus Sony HX1, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-500 (8MP) and the HX1 (9MP) is relatively similar but the E-500 (Four Thirds) and HX1 (1/2.4") possess different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-500 was launched 4 years prior to the HX1 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony HX1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the E-500 matches up vs the HX1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-500 vs Sony HX1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-500 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Sony HX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Sony HX1
E-500 | HX1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX1 over the Olympus E-500
HX1 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | April 2009 | October 2005 | More modern by 42 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 215k | Sharper screen (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Sony HX1
E-500 | HX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Sony HX1 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-500 offers exterior dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) while the Sony HX1 has specifications of 115mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.5" x 3.3" x 3.6") with a weight of 544 grams (1.20 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-500 versus Sony HX1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the E-500 against the HX1.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and HX1 is 70 and 67 respectively.
Olympus E-500 vs Sony HX1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizes simply by going over technical specs. The image underneath may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-500 and HX1.
As you can tell, each of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-500 due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh simpler and the Sony HX1 will deliver extra detail utilizing its extra 1MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged E-500 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-500 vs Sony HX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-500 vs Sony HX1 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus E-500 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1 |
Alternate name | EVOLT E-500 | - |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2005-10-21 | 2009-04-22 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.4" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3456 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-560mm (20.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.2 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 215 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 9.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Front Curtain, Rear Curtain |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1440x1080 |
Video file format | - | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 479 grams (1.06 lb) | 544 grams (1.20 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 115 x 83 x 92mm (4.5" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $600 | $47,999 |