Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Sony HX300

Portability
70
Imaging
42
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 front
Portability
63
Imaging
45
Features
51
Overall
47

Olympus E-500 vs Sony HX300 Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Revealed October 2005
  • Also Known as EVOLT E-500
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-510
Sony HX300
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 80 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
  • 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
  • Launched February 2013
  • Old Model is Sony HX200V
  • Successor is Sony HX400V
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-500 vs Sony HX300 Overview

Its time to look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-500 and Sony HX300, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and HX300 (20MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and HX300 (1/2.3") have different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-500 was announced 8 years prior to the HX300 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple summary of how the E-500 scores vs the HX300 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Sony HX300

 E-500 HX300 

Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Olympus E-500

 HX300 E-500 
LaunchedFebruary 2013October 2005More modern by 89 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display dimensions3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution921k215kClearer display (+706k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Sony HX300

 E-500 HX300 
Focus manually More precise focus
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither contains Touch friendly display

Olympus E-500 vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison

When you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-500 has got external measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") having a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Sony HX300 has sizing of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-500 and Sony HX300 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have at that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-500 compared to the HX300.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony HX300 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and HX300 is 70 and 63 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony HX300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizes only by seeing specs. The pic here will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-500 and HX300.

All in all, both cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-500 with its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF easier and the Sony HX300 will provide more detail with its extra 12 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics more aggressively. The more aged E-500 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony HX300 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Sony HX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-500 Portrait photography info
Sony HX300 Portrait photography info
49
focusing manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
does not have liveview
resolution not great (8MP)
43
you can focus manually
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 Street photography info
Sony HX300 Street photography info
57
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
lighter than others (479g)
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
50
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
heavier than competitors in class (623 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-500
Sports photography with Sony HX300
37
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect autofocus
does not have liveview
low frames per second (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (8 megapixels)
55
incredible zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
provides tracking autofocus
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-500 Travel photography information
Sony HX300 Travel photography information
52
lighter than others (479g)
built-in flash
no Timelapse mode
resolution not great (8MP)
display is not selfie friendly
54
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
built-in flash
rather wide (24mm)
long reach (1200mm)
no Time Lapse recording
heavier than competitors in class (623g)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony HX300 as a Landscape photography camera
43
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
small screen (2.5 inches)
does not have liveview
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (8 megapixels)
low maximum ISO (400)
no Timelapse mode
49
you can focus manually
rather wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
no Time Lapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Vlogging camera
Sony HX300 as a Vlogging camera
9
lack of video recording
25
rather wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
no external mic jack
heavier than competitors in class (623 grams)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-500 vs Sony HX300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Sony HX300
 Olympus E-500Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-500 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300
Also Known as EVOLT E-500 -
Type Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2005-10-21 2013-02-20
Body design Mid-size SLR SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Full resolution 3264 x 2448 5184 x 3888
Max native ISO 400 12800
Max boosted ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-1200mm (50.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.8-6.3
Amount of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen diagonal 2.5" 3"
Resolution of screen 215 thousand dot 921 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) Electronic
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per sec 10.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 13.00 m (at ISO 100) -
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye -
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps)
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 479 gr (1.06 lbs) 623 gr (1.37 lbs)
Physical dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) -
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card -
Storage slots One One
Launch price $600 $339