Olympus E-500 vs Sony RX1
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
79 Imaging
69 Features
57 Overall
64
Olympus E-500 vs Sony RX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Announced October 2005
- Also Known as EVOLT E-500
- Replacement is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0-22.0) lens
- 482g - 113 x 65 x 70mm
- Launched February 2013
Olympus E-500 vs Sony RX1 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus E-500 and Sony RX1, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and RX1 (24MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and RX1 (Full frame) offer different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-500 was unveiled 8 years earlier than the RX1 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony RX1 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the E-500 matches up versus the RX1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-500 vs Sony RX1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-500 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Sony RX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Sony RX1
E-500 | RX1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX1 over the Olympus E-500
RX1 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2013 | October 2005 | More recent by 89 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1229k | 215k | Clearer screen (+1014k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Sony RX1
E-500 | RX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Sony RX1 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-500 has physical dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Sony RX1 has specifications of 113mm x 65mm x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") having a weight of 482 grams (1.06 lbs).
See the Olympus E-500 and Sony RX1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the E-500 and the RX1.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and RX1 is 70 and 79 respectively.
Olympus E-500 vs Sony RX1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to imagine the gap between sensor measurements merely by reviewing specs. The photograph below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-500 and RX1.
All in all, each of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-500 using its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF tougher and the Sony RX1 will deliver greater detail having an extra 16 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older E-500 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-500 vs Sony RX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-500 vs Sony RX1 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-500 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 |
Also called as | EVOLT E-500 | - |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2005-10-21 | 2013-02-19 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 35.8 x 23.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 852.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 24MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 6000 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 25600 |
Max enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 35mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.0-22.0 |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 215k dot | 1,229k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | Xtra FineTFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic and Optical (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 479g (1.06 lb) | 482g (1.06 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 113 x 65 x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 93 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 25.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 14.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 2534 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 270 pictures |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $600 | $2,798 |