Olympus E-500 vs Sony RX10 III
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
53 Imaging
52 Features
77 Overall
62
Olympus E-500 vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Launched October 2005
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-500
- Renewed by Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
- Launched March 2016
- Previous Model is Sony RX10 II
- Later Model is Sony RX10 IV
Olympus E-500 vs Sony RX10 III Overview
The following is a in-depth comparison of the Olympus E-500 versus Sony RX10 III, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and RX10 III (20MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and RX10 III (1") have totally different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-500 was manufactured 11 years before the RX10 III which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony RX10 III being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a concise summary of how the E-500 matches up versus the RX10 III in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-500 vs Sony RX10 III Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-500 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Sony RX10 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Sony RX10 III
E-500 | RX10 III |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Olympus E-500
RX10 III | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | March 2016 | October 2005 | Newer by 127 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 1229k | 215k | Sharper display (+1014k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Sony RX10 III
E-500 | RX10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither comes with Touch display |
Olympus E-500 vs Sony RX10 III Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-500 comes with outside measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) while the Sony RX10 III has proportions of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") with a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-500 versus Sony RX10 III in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the E-500 compared to the RX10 III.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and RX10 III is 70 and 53 respectively.
Olympus E-500 vs Sony RX10 III Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to envision the difference in sensor dimensions purely by viewing technical specs. The pic here might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-500 and RX10 III.
As you can tell, each of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-500 due to its larger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Sony RX10 III will render greater detail due to its extra 12 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-500 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-500 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-500 vs Sony RX10 III Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-500 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-500 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2005-10-21 | 2016-03-29 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.4-4.0 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 215k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 14.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 479 grams (1.06 lb) | 1051 grams (2.32 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 472 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 420 photographs |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $600 | $1,398 |