Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Sony RX10 III

Portability
70
Imaging
42
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III front
Portability
53
Imaging
53
Features
77
Overall
62

Olympus E-500 vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Launched October 2005
  • Additionally Known as EVOLT E-500
  • Renewed by Olympus E-510
Sony RX10 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
  • 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
  • Launched March 2016
  • Previous Model is Sony RX10 II
  • Later Model is Sony RX10 IV
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-500 vs Sony RX10 III Overview

The following is a in-depth comparison of the Olympus E-500 versus Sony RX10 III, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and RX10 III (20MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and RX10 III (1") have totally different sensor size.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The E-500 was manufactured 11 years before the RX10 III which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony RX10 III being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a concise summary of how the E-500 matches up versus the RX10 III in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Sony RX10 III

 E-500 RX10 III 

Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Olympus E-500

 RX10 III E-500 
LaunchedMarch 2016October 2005Newer by 127 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display dimensions3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution1229k215kSharper display (+1014k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Sony RX10 III

 E-500 RX10 III 
Manually focus More exact focusing
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch display Neither comes with Touch display

Olympus E-500 vs Sony RX10 III Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to travel with your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-500 comes with outside measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) while the Sony RX10 III has proportions of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") with a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-500 versus Sony RX10 III in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the E-500 compared to the RX10 III.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony RX10 III size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and RX10 III is 70 and 53 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony RX10 III top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Sony RX10 III Sensor Comparison

Often, its hard to envision the difference in sensor dimensions purely by viewing technical specs. The pic here might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-500 and RX10 III.

As you can tell, each of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-500 due to its larger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Sony RX10 III will render greater detail due to its extra 12 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-500 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony RX10 III sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-500
Portrait photography with Sony RX10 III
49
manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
doesn't have liveview
low MP (8 megapixels)
71
has manual focus
megapixel count good (20MP)
sensor size is decent (1")
comes with face detect autofocus
saves RAW formats
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 Street photography info
Sony RX10 III Street photography info
57
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
lighter than average (479 grams)
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
64
tilting screen
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is decent (1")
saves RAW formats
weather sealing
heavier than competition in class (1,051 grams)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-500 Sports photography factors
Sony RX10 III Sports photography factors
37
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect AF
doesn't have liveview
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
low MP (8 megapixels)
70
amazing zoom range (24-600mm 25.0 x zoom)
quiet shooting (1/32,000s)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (1")
comes with tracking focus
weather sealing
better than average battery (420 CIPA)
has no phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-500 Travel photography factors
Sony RX10 III Travel photography factors
52
lighter than average (479 grams)
has built in flash
missing Timelapse recording
low MP (8 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
55
better than average battery (420 per charge)
weather sealing
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
has built in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
long reach (600mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition in class (1,051g)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f2.4)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-500 Landscape photography info
Sony RX10 III Landscape photography info
43
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
small screen (2.5")
doesn't have liveview
lack of image stabilization
low MP (8 megapixels)
maximum ISO low (400)
missing Timelapse recording
64
has manual focus
relatively wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (1")
saves RAW formats
weather sealing
better than average battery (420 shots)
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.4)
missing Time Lapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 Vlogging factors
Sony RX10 III Vlogging factors
9
can't shoot video
28
relatively wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detect autofocus
high res video (3840 x 2160 pxls)
includes mic socket
slow max aperture (f2.4)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
heavier than competition in class (1,051 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-500 vs Sony RX10 III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Sony RX10 III
 Olympus E-500Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-500 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-500 -
Type Advanced DSLR Large Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2005-10-21 2016-03-29
Physical type Mid-size SLR SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor - Bionz X
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3264 x 2448 5472 x 3648
Maximum native ISO 400 12800
Maximum boosted ISO 1600 25600
Lowest native ISO 100 125
RAW data
Lowest boosted ISO - 64
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 3 25
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-600mm (25.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.4-4.0
Macro focusing distance - 3cm
Available lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 2.7
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display size 2.5 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 215k dots 1,229k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359k dots
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x 0.7x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Maximum quiet shutter speed - 1/32000s
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames per sec 14.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 13.00 m (at ISO 100) 10.80 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Maximum video resolution None 3840x2160
Video data format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 479 grams (1.06 lb) 1051 grams (2.32 lb)
Physical dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 70
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 23.1
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.6
DXO Low light rating not tested 472
Other
Battery life - 420 photographs
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $600 $1,398