Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Sony RX1R II

Portability
70
Imaging
42
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II front
Portability
78
Imaging
76
Features
65
Overall
71

Olympus E-500 vs Sony RX1R II Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Announced October 2005
  • Alternate Name is EVOLT E-500
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-510
Sony RX1R II
(Full Review)
  • 42MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 50 - 25600 (Raise to 102400)
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 35mm (F2.0) lens
  • 507g - 113 x 65 x 72mm
  • Revealed October 2015
  • Previous Model is Sony RX1R
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-500 vs Sony RX1R II Overview

The following is a thorough assessment of the Olympus E-500 and Sony RX1R II, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and RX1R II (42MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and RX1R II (Full frame) use totally different sensor sizes.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-500 was manufactured 11 years earlier than the RX1R II which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony RX1R II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a quick overview of how the E-500 grades against the RX1R II with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Sony RX1R II

 E-500 RX1R II 

Reasons to pick Sony RX1R II over the Olympus E-500

 RX1R II E-500 
RevealedOctober 2015October 2005Newer by 121 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen dimension3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution1229k215kClearer screen (+1014k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Sony RX1R II

 E-500 RX1R II 
Focus manually Very precise focusing
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch screen Lack of Touch screen

Olympus E-500 vs Sony RX1R II Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-500 has got outside measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Sony RX1R II has dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") along with a weight of 507 grams (1.12 lbs).

See the Olympus E-500 and Sony RX1R II in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose at that time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the E-500 vs the RX1R II.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony RX1R II size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-500 and RX1R II is 70 and 78 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony RX1R II top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Sony RX1R II Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very difficult to envision the difference in sensor dimensions merely by viewing technical specs. The pic underneath might offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-500 and RX1R II.

As you have seen, the two cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-500 due to its smaller sensor will make shooting shallow DOF trickier and the Sony RX1R II will provide you with extra detail due to its extra 34MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-500 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony RX1R II sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Sony RX1R II Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Sony RX1R II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-500
Portrait photography with Sony RX1R II
49
focusing manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
doesn't have liveview
low megapixels (8 megapixels)
85
you can focus manually
high flash sync speed (1/4,000 seconds)
amazing MP (42MP)
large sensor size (Full frame)
provides face detection focus
delivers RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 Street photography info
Sony RX1R II Street photography info
57
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
lighter than competition (479g)
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
73
has a tilting screen
large sensor size (Full frame)
delivers RAW files
above average high ISO (25,600)
no image stabilization
heavier than average in class (507g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-500
Sports photography with Sony RX1R II
37
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect autofocus
doesn't have liveview
max frames per second low (3.0 fps)
no image stabilization
low megapixels (8 megapixels)
63
amazing MP (42 megapixels)
large sensor size (Full frame)
provides tracking autofocus
sensor has phase detect auto focus
can't change focal length (35mm)
max frames per second low (5.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
terrible battery life (220 per charge)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-500 Travel photography details
Sony RX1R II Travel photography details
52
lighter than competition (479 grams)
built-in flash
does not have Timelapse function
low megapixels (8 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
59
amazing MP (42 megapixels)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
terrible battery life (220 CIPA)
heavier than average in class (507 grams)
does not offer selfie friendly display
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-500 Landscape photography advice
Sony RX1R II Landscape photography advice
43
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inch)
doesn't have liveview
no image stabilization
low megapixels (8MP)
max ISO too low (400)
does not have Timelapse function
68
you can focus manually
fast max aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3")
amazing MP (42 megapixels)
large sensor size (Full frame)
doesnt have anti-alias filter
above average high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (35mm)
no image stabilization
terrible battery life (220 per charge)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 Vlogging details
Sony RX1R II Vlogging details
9
lack of video recording
34
fast max aperture (f2.0)
provides face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
includes external mic socket
does not offer selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
heavier than average in class (507g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-500 vs Sony RX1R II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Sony RX1R II
 Olympus E-500Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-500 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-500 -
Type Advanced DSLR Large Sensor Compact
Announced 2005-10-21 2015-10-13
Physical type Mid-size SLR Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - BIONZ X
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Full frame
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 35.9 x 24mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 861.6mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 42 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3264 x 2448 7952 x 5304
Max native ISO 400 25600
Max enhanced ISO 1600 102400
Min native ISO 100 50
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 3 25
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 35mm (1x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.0
Macro focus range - 14cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 1
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display diagonal 2.5 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 215 thousand dots 1,229 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage 95% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x 0.74x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps 5.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 13.00 m (at ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Off, auto, fill flash, slow sync, rear sync, wireless
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/180 secs 1/4000 secs
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (120p, 30p)
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 479 grams (1.06 lb) 507 grams (1.12 lb)
Dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 113 x 65 x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 97
DXO Color Depth score not tested 25.8
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 13.9
DXO Low light score not tested 3204
Other
Battery life - 220 photos
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery model - NP-BX1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2,5, 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo
Card slots 1 1
Cost at release $600 $3,300