Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Sony S2000

Portability
70
Imaging
41
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 front
Portability
93
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26

Olympus E-500 vs Sony S2000 Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Introduced October 2005
  • Other Name is EVOLT E-500
  • Updated by Olympus E-510
Sony S2000
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
  • Released January 2010
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-500 vs Sony S2000 Overview

Its time to take a closer look at the Olympus E-500 vs Sony S2000, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-500 (8MP) and the S2000 (10MP) is fairly well matched but the E-500 (Four Thirds) and S2000 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-500 was brought out 5 years earlier than the S2000 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony S2000 being a Compact camera.

Before getting through a full comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the E-500 scores vs the S2000 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Sony S2000

 E-500 S2000 
Focus manually Dial precise focusing

Reasons to pick Sony S2000 over the Olympus E-500

 S2000 E-500 
ReleasedJanuary 2010October 2005More recent by 51 months
Display sizing3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution230k215kSharper display (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Sony S2000

 E-500 S2000 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither features Touch friendly display

Olympus E-500 vs Sony S2000 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-500 enjoys outer dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Sony S2000 has sizing of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-500 vs Sony S2000 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the E-500 versus the S2000.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony S2000 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-500 and S2000 is 70 and 93 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony S2000 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Sony S2000 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is very difficult to see the difference between sensor measurements simply by checking a spec sheet. The graphic below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-500 and S2000.

Clearly, each of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-500 due to its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Sony S2000 will give you more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics a little more aggressively. The older E-500 is going to be behind in sensor technology.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony S2000 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Sony S2000 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Sony S2000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-500 Portrait photography highlights
Sony S2000 Portrait photography highlights
48
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
no liveview feature
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
19
lack of manual focus
no manual mode
external flash not possible
low resolution (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 Street photography highlights
Sony S2000 Street photography highlights
56
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than competition in class (479g)
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
46
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-500 Sports photography factors
Sony S2000 Sports photography factors
37
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect AF
no liveview feature
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
16
max shutter speed is low (1/1,200 seconds)
max fps very slow (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
low resolution (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-500 Travel photography info
Sony S2000 Travel photography info
52
lighter than competition in class (479g)
built-in flash
no Time Lapse mode
megapixel count low (8MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
50
has built in flash
does not have Timelapse mode
low resolution (10MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (33mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-500 Landscape photography advice
Sony S2000 Landscape photography advice
43
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
screen is small (2.5 inch)
no liveview feature
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
max ISO too low (400)
no Time Lapse mode
27
good sized screen (3 inches)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (33mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
no manual mode
does not have image stabilization
low resolution (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
does not have Timelapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Vlogging camera
Sony S2000 as a Vlogging camera
9
can't shoot video
21
wide angle not good (33mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have microphone support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-500 vs Sony S2000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Sony S2000
 Olympus E-500Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-500 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000
Alternate name EVOLT E-500 -
Type Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2005-10-21 2010-01-07
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3264 x 2448 3456 x 2592
Maximum native ISO 400 3200
Maximum enhanced ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 33-105mm (3.2x)
Largest aperture - f/3.1-5.6
Macro focus range - 5cm
Total lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.5 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 215k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 1s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1200s
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 13.00 m (at ISO 100) 3.30 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 640x480
Video format - Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 479g (1.06 lb) 167g (0.37 lb)
Dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - 2 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Retail price $600 $225