Olympus E-500 vs Sony T900
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Olympus E-500 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Launched October 2005
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-500
- Renewed by Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Introduced February 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-500 vs Sony T900 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus E-500 and Sony T900, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and T900 (12MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and T900 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-500 was unveiled 4 years prior to the T900 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a quick view of how the E-500 grades versus the T900 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-500 vs Sony T900 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-500 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Sony T900
| E-500 | T900 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Olympus E-500
| T900 | E-500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2009 | October 2005 | More recent by 40 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3.5" | 2.5" | Larger display (+1") | |
| Display resolution | 922k | 215k | Crisper display (+707k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Sony T900
| E-500 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera often, you need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-500 provides physical dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Sony T900 has specifications of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-500 and Sony T900 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the E-500 versus the T900.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and T900 is 70 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-500 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to envision the difference in sensor measurements just by viewing specifications. The photograph underneath will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-500 and T900.
Plainly, both of those cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-500 having a larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Sony T900 will render extra detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older E-500 will be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus E-500 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus E-500 vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Olympus E-500 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus E-500 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Also called as | EVOLT E-500 | - |
| Class | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2005-10-21 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5" | 3.5" |
| Resolution of display | 215 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 2s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 479 gr (1.06 lb) | 143 gr (0.32 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $600 | $300 |