Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Sony TX9

Portability
70
Imaging
41
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 front
Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
40
Overall
37

Olympus E-500 vs Sony TX9 Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Revealed October 2005
  • Also referred to as EVOLT E-500
  • Later Model is Olympus E-510
Sony TX9
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
  • 149g - 98 x 60 x 18mm
  • Introduced July 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-500 vs Sony TX9 Overview

Below, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-500 and Sony TX9, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and TX9 (12MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and TX9 (1/2.3") possess different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-500 was announced 5 years prior to the TX9 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony TX9 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-500 grades vs the TX9 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Sony TX9

 E-500 TX9 

Reasons to pick Sony TX9 over the Olympus E-500

 TX9 E-500 
IntroducedJuly 2010October 2005More recent by 57 months
Screen dimension3.5"2.5"Bigger screen (+1")
Screen resolution922k215kCrisper screen (+707k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Sony TX9

 E-500 TX9 
Focus manually More precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen

Olympus E-500 vs Sony TX9 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera often, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-500 has got external measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Sony TX9 has proportions of 98mm x 60mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") with a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-500 and Sony TX9 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the E-500 compared to the TX9.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony TX9 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and TX9 is 70 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony TX9 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Sony TX9 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is very hard to imagine the difference between sensor measurements simply by checking specifications. The photograph underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-500 and TX9.

Plainly, both of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-500 having a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Sony TX9 will give you extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The older E-500 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony TX9 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Sony TX9 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Sony TX9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-500 Portrait photography details
Sony TX9 Portrait photography details
48
manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
no liveview
low megapixels (8MP)
27
focusing manually
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 Street photography features
Sony TX9 Street photography features
56
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
lighter than competition (479 grams)
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
60
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports touch focus
no moving screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
heavier than others in class (149g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-500
Sports photography with Sony TX9
37
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect AF
no liveview
low fps (3.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (8 megapixels)
34
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-500 Travel photography details
Sony TX9 Travel photography details
52
lighter than competition (479 grams)
built-in flash
no Timelapse function
low megapixels (8MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
60
supports touch focus
built-in flash
reasonably wide (25mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
heavier than others in class (149 grams)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.5)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-500 Landscape photography highlights
Sony TX9 Landscape photography highlights
43
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inch)
no liveview
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (8MP)
low max ISO (400)
no Timelapse function
41
focusing manually
reasonably wide (25mm)
bigger than average screen (3.5 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
manual mode not available
sensor resolution low (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
missing Time Lapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 Vlogging information
Sony TX9 Vlogging information
9
lack of video recording
32
reasonably wide (25mm)
screen is touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
missing mic port
heavier than others in class (149 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-500 vs Sony TX9 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Sony TX9
 Olympus E-500Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-500 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9
Also referred to as EVOLT E-500 -
Class Advanced DSLR Ultracompact
Revealed 2005-10-21 2010-07-08
Body design Mid-size SLR Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor - Bionz
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 3264 x 2448 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 400 3200
Max boosted ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 125
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-100mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.5-4.6
Macro focus range - 1cm
Available lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5 inches 3.5 inches
Resolution of screen 215 thousand dot 922 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 2 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 13.00 m (at ISO 100) 3.80 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (50 fps), 1440 x 1080 (50, 25fps), 1280 x 720 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (25 fps)
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - AVCHD
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 479 gr (1.06 pounds) 149 gr (0.33 pounds)
Dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 98 x 60 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2)
Time lapse feature
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/ SDHC/ SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal
Storage slots One One
Launch cost $600 $799