Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Sony W230

Portability
70
Imaging
41
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W230 front
Portability
95
Imaging
34
Features
25
Overall
30

Olympus E-500 vs Sony W230 Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Revealed October 2005
  • Alternative Name is EVOLT E-500
  • Renewed by Olympus E-510
Sony W230
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 30-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
  • 156g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
  • Revealed February 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-500 vs Sony W230 Overview

Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus E-500 versus Sony W230, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and W230 (12MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and W230 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizes.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-500 was released 4 years before the W230 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony W230 being a Compact camera.

Before diving straight into a complete comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the E-500 matches up versus the W230 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Sony W230

 E-500 W230 

Reasons to pick Sony W230 over the Olympus E-500

 W230 E-500 
RevealedFebruary 2009October 2005Fresher by 40 months
Display dimension3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution230k215kCrisper display (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Sony W230

 E-500 W230 
Manually focus Dial accurate focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither has Touch friendly display

Olympus E-500 vs Sony W230 Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to carry your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-500 has physical measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Sony W230 has sizing of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-500 versus Sony W230 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the E-500 compared to the W230.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony W230 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-500 and W230 is 70 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony W230 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Sony W230 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it's hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizing purely by checking a spec sheet. The graphic underneath might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-500 and W230.

As you can see, the 2 cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-500 because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Sony W230 will give you extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older E-500 is going to be behind in sensor technology.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony W230 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Sony W230 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Sony W230 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-500
Portrait photography with Sony W230
48
focusing manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
doesn't have liveview
low resolution sensor (8 megapixels)
27
has manual focus
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 Street photography features
Sony W230 Street photography features
56
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
lighter than others in class (479 grams)
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
56
has image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Sports photography camera
Sony W230 as a Sports photography camera
37
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect autofocus
doesn't have liveview
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
low resolution sensor (8MP)
25
has image stabilization (Optical)
continuous shooting slow (2.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-500
Travel photography with Sony W230
52
lighter than others in class (479 grams)
flash built-in
does not have Time Lapse recording
low resolution sensor (8 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
51
flash built-in
does not have Time Lapse function
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (30mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-500
Landscape photography with Sony W230
43
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
small screen (2.5 inches)
doesn't have liveview
does not have image stabilization
low resolution sensor (8MP)
maximum ISO low (400)
does not have Time Lapse recording
36
has manual focus
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (30mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
manual exposure not available
low megapixels (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
does not have Time Lapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 Vlogging information
Sony W230 Vlogging information
9
no video
25
has image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not the best (30mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have external mic socket
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-500 vs Sony W230 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Sony W230
 Olympus E-500Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W230
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-500 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W230
Other name EVOLT E-500 -
Class Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2005-10-21 2009-02-17
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3264 x 2448 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 400 3200
Max enhanced ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 30-120mm (4.0x)
Max aperture - f/2.8-5.8
Macro focusing distance - 4cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.5 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 215k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 1 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 13.00 m (at ISO 100) 3.90 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 640x480
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 479g (1.06 lbs) 156g (0.34 lbs)
Dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Price at release $600 $180