Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Sony W310

Portability
70
Imaging
42
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W310 front
Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
17
Overall
27

Olympus E-500 vs Sony W310 Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Announced October 2005
  • Alternative Name is EVOLT E-500
  • Successor is Olympus E-510
Sony W310
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-112mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
  • 137g - 95 x 55 x 19mm
  • Introduced January 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-500 vs Sony W310 Overview

Let's examine more closely at the Olympus E-500 versus Sony W310, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and W310 (12MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and W310 (1/2.3") come with different sensor size.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-500 was brought out 5 years before the W310 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony W310 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a short summary of how the E-500 scores versus the W310 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Sony W310

 E-500 W310 
Focus manually Very precise focusing

Reasons to pick Sony W310 over the Olympus E-500

 W310 E-500 
IntroducedJanuary 2010October 2005Fresher by 51 months
Screen sizing2.7"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.2")
Screen resolution230k215kSharper screen (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Sony W310

 E-500 W310 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither offers Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-500 vs Sony W310 Physical Comparison

If you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-500 offers physical measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Sony W310 has measurements of 95mm x 55mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-500 versus Sony W310 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-500 versus the W310.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony W310 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and W310 is 70 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony W310 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Sony W310 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizing only by looking at a spec sheet. The visual here may offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-500 and W310.

Clearly, both of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-500 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Sony W310 will resolve extra detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The older E-500 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony W310 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Sony W310 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Sony W310 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony W310 as a Portrait photography camera
49
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
no liveview
low MP (8 megapixels)
21
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Street photography camera
Sony W310 as a Street photography camera
57
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
lighter than average (479g)
no moving screen
no image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
57
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-500 Sports photography details
Sony W310 Sports photography details
37
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect AF
no liveview
low frames per second (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
low MP (8MP)
25
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Travel photography camera
Sony W310 as a Travel photography camera
52
lighter than average (479 grams)
flash built-in
doesn't have Time Lapse function
low MP (8MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
58
flash built-in
decently wide (28mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-500
Landscape photography with Sony W310
43
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen is small (2.5 inches)
no liveview
no image stabilization
low MP (8MP)
low maximum ISO (400)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
32
decently wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not available
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 Vlogging details
Sony W310 Vlogging details
9
no video recording
29
decently wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have microphone port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-500 vs Sony W310 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Sony W310
 Olympus E-500Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W310
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-500 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W310
Also called EVOLT E-500 -
Class Advanced DSLR Ultracompact
Announced 2005-10-21 2010-01-07
Body design Mid-size SLR Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 3264 x 2448 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 400 3200
Max enhanced ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-112mm (4.0x)
Max aperture - f/3.0-5.8
Macro focus distance - 5cm
Total lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.5 inches 2.7 inches
Display resolution 215 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 1 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 3.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 13.00 m (at ISO 100) 3.00 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 640x480
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 479g (1.06 lbs) 137g (0.30 lbs)
Dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 95 x 55 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 sec or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Storage slots One One
Price at release $600 $150