Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Sony W350

Portability
70
Imaging
42
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350 front
Portability
97
Imaging
37
Features
25
Overall
32

Olympus E-500 vs Sony W350 Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Launched October 2005
  • Other Name is EVOLT E-500
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-510
Sony W350
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
  • 117g - 91 x 52 x 17mm
  • Released January 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-500 vs Sony W350 Overview

Following is a complete overview of the Olympus E-500 and Sony W350, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and W350 (14MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and W350 (1/2.3") use different sensor size.

Photography Glossary

The E-500 was launched 5 years prior to the W350 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony W350 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before diving straight into a complete comparison, below is a short summary of how the E-500 grades vs the W350 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Sony W350

 E-500 W350 
Manual focus Very accurate focusing

Reasons to pick Sony W350 over the Olympus E-500

 W350 E-500 
ReleasedJanuary 2010October 2005More modern by 51 months
Screen sizing2.7"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.2")
Screen resolution230k215kClearer screen (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Sony W350

 E-500 W350 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch screen Missing Touch screen

Olympus E-500 vs Sony W350 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to carry around your camera, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-500 comes with outer dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Sony W350 has sizing of 91mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") with a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-500 and Sony W350 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the E-500 and the W350.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony W350 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and W350 is 70 and 97 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony W350 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Sony W350 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it can be hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizes only by looking at specifications. The pic here will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-500 and W350.

Plainly, both of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-500 because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Sony W350 will give you extra detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged E-500 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony W350 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Sony W350 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Sony W350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-500
Portrait photography with Sony W350
49
manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
does not have liveview
megapixel count low (8MP)
28
decent megapixels (14MP)
no manual focus
no manual mode
can't use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 Street photography information
Sony W350 Street photography information
57
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
lighter than competition (479 grams)
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
58
image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-500
Sports photography with Sony W350
37
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect autofocus
does not have liveview
continuous shooting slow (3.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
35
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
max frames per second very slow (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Travel photography camera
Sony W350 as a Travel photography camera
52
lighter than competition (479 grams)
flash built-in
does not have Timelapse mode
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
66
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (26mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.7)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-500 Landscape photography details
Sony W350 Landscape photography details
43
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
tiny screen (2.5 inches)
does not have liveview
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
max ISO too low (400)
does not have Timelapse mode
38
really wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (14MP)
no manual focus
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.7)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
no manual mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
does not have Timelapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 Vlogging advice
Sony W350 Vlogging advice
9
no video shooting
29
really wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.7)
screen is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have microphone jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-500 vs Sony W350 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Sony W350
 Olympus E-500Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-500 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350
Alternate name EVOLT E-500 -
Type Advanced DSLR Ultracompact
Launched 2005-10-21 2010-01-07
Body design Mid-size SLR Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 3264 x 2448 4320 x 3240
Max native ISO 400 3200
Max boosted ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 26-105mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.7-5.7
Macro focusing range - 10cm
Available lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.5" 2.7"
Screen resolution 215 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 2 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 13.00 m (at ISO 100) 3.80 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video format - Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 479 gr (1.06 pounds) 117 gr (0.26 pounds)
Dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 91 x 52 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID - NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 sec or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Storage slots One One
Launch cost $600 $200