Olympus E-500 vs Sony W350
70 Imaging
42 Features
34 Overall
38
97 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
Olympus E-500 vs Sony W350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Launched October 2005
- Other Name is EVOLT E-500
- Refreshed by Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 117g - 91 x 52 x 17mm
- Released January 2010
Olympus E-500 vs Sony W350 Overview
Following is a complete overview of the Olympus E-500 and Sony W350, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and W350 (14MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and W350 (1/2.3") use different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe E-500 was launched 5 years prior to the W350 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony W350 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight into a complete comparison, below is a short summary of how the E-500 grades vs the W350 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-500 vs Sony W350 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-500 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Sony W350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Sony W350
E-500 | W350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony W350 over the Olympus E-500
W350 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2010 | October 2005 | More modern by 51 months | |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 215k | Clearer screen (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Sony W350
E-500 | W350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Sony W350 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-500 comes with outer dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Sony W350 has sizing of 91mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") with a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-500 and Sony W350 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the E-500 and the W350.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and W350 is 70 and 97 respectively.
Olympus E-500 vs Sony W350 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizes only by looking at specifications. The pic here will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-500 and W350.
Plainly, both of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-500 because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Sony W350 will give you extra detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged E-500 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-500 vs Sony W350 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-500 vs Sony W350 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-500 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350 |
Alternate name | EVOLT E-500 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2005-10-21 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.7-5.7 |
Macro focusing range | - | 10cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 215 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 2 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 479 gr (1.06 pounds) | 117 gr (0.26 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 91 x 52 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $600 | $200 |