Olympus E-500 vs Sony W690
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
95 Imaging
39 Features
32 Overall
36
Olympus E-500 vs Sony W690 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Introduced October 2005
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-500
- Later Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 142g - 94 x 56 x 22mm
- Released February 2012
Olympus E-500 vs Sony W690 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-500 and Sony W690, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and W690 (16MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and W690 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor size.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-500 was revealed 7 years before the W690 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony W690 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a complete comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the E-500 scores versus the W690 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-500 vs Sony W690 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-500 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W690. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Sony W690 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Sony W690
E-500 | W690 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Sony W690 over the Olympus E-500
W690 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2012 | October 2005 | More recent by 77 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 215k | Clearer screen (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Sony W690
E-500 | W690 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Sony W690 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera, you should factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-500 features outside measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") having a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Sony W690 has dimensions of 94mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-500 and Sony W690 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the E-500 compared to the W690.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and W690 is 70 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-500 vs Sony W690 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to see the gap between sensor measurements purely by looking at specs. The graphic below may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-500 and W690.
All in all, each of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-500 having a bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh easier and the Sony W690 will give extra detail because of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older E-500 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus E-500 vs Sony W690 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-500 vs Sony W690 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W690 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-500 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W690 |
Also called as | EVOLT E-500 | - |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2005-10-21 | 2012-02-28 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 215 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | ClearPhoto TFT LCD display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.30 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 479 gr (1.06 pounds) | 142 gr (0.31 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 94 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 pictures |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $600 | $297 |