Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-870
69 Imaging
44 Features
42 Overall
43
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 490g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Announced November 2007
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-510
- Succeeded the Olympus E-500
- Refreshed by Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Increase to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2016
- Replaced the Olympus TG-860
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-870 Overview
Below is a in depth comparison of the Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-870, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Ultracompact and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the E-510 (10MP) and TG-870 (16MP) and the E-510 (Four Thirds) and TG-870 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-510 was announced 9 years prior to the TG-870 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-510 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight into a complete comparison, below is a concise summary of how the E-510 scores against the TG-870 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-870 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-510 and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-510 Gallery and Olympus TG-870 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-510 over the Olympus TG-870
E-510 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Olympus E-510
TG-870 | E-510 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2016 | November 2007 | More recent by 98 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Sharper screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-510 and Olympus TG-870
E-510 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera often, you need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-510 enjoys physical measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 490 grams (1.08 lbs) and the Olympus TG-870 has measurements of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-870 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the E-510 vs the TG-870.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-510 and TG-870 is 69 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to envision the gap in sensor measurements simply by researching specifications. The graphic underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-510 and TG-870.
Plainly, each of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-510 using its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus TG-870 will result in extra detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The older E-510 will be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications
Olympus E-510 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-510 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 |
Also called | EVOLT E-510 | - |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2007-11-23 | 2016-01-06 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 490 grams (1.08 pounds) | 221 grams (0.49 pounds) |
Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 52 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.0 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 442 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $550 | $280 |