Olympus E-510 vs Olympus XZ-10
69 Imaging
44 Features
42 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7bbb/a7bbb390f9986c1e7150b0a6b5b379be6bcbd98e" alt="Olympus E-510 front Olympus E-510 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82a12/82a1263e2fcea5ac4d6bef1198741cbea2097fd0" alt="Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front"
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 490g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Revealed November 2007
- Also referred to as EVOLT E-510
- Succeeded the Olympus E-500
- Replacement is Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Announced January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview
The following is a extensive assessment of the Olympus E-510 and Olympus XZ-10, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are designed by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-510 (10MP) and the XZ-10 (12MP) is pretty close but the E-510 (Four Thirds) and XZ-10 (1/2.3") offer different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-510 was released 6 years prior to the XZ-10 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-510 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a thorough comparison, here is a quick view of how the E-510 grades versus the XZ-10 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus XZ-10 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-510 & Olympus Stylus XZ-10. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-510 Gallery & Olympus XZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-510 over the Olympus XZ-10
E-510 | XZ-10 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Olympus E-510
XZ-10 | E-510 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | ![]() | November 2007 | Newer by 63 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-510 and Olympus XZ-10
E-510 | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-510 offers outside measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") accompanied by a weight of 490 grams (1.08 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-10 has specifications of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-510 and Olympus XZ-10 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using during that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the E-510 versus the XZ-10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/453c0/453c06132f726e4985bbc2dec7d12ab08f3ce7db" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Olympus XZ-10 size comparison Olympus E-510 vs Olympus XZ-10 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-510 and XZ-10 is 69 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98119/98119f1237d44884e8f102ce5698b16108f43adb" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Olympus XZ-10 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-510 vs Olympus XZ-10 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions only by viewing technical specs. The image underneath may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-510 and XZ-10.
As you can tell, both cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-510 due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh simpler and the Olympus XZ-10 will render greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged E-510 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46378/46378c90e527572a7fd7b46956cc0ff06301b7f9" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Olympus XZ-10 sensor size comparison Olympus E-510 vs Olympus XZ-10 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92290/9229017ddf35f260136d309caca42e69cc6c945f" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-510 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications
Olympus E-510 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-510 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 |
Also called | EVOLT E-510 | - |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2007-11-23 | 2013-01-30 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/1.8-2.7 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 490 grams (1.08 pounds) | 221 grams (0.49 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 52 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.0 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 442 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 images |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $550 | $428 |