Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
69 Imaging
44 Features
42 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7bbb/a7bbb390f9986c1e7150b0a6b5b379be6bcbd98e" alt="Olympus E-510 front Olympus E-510 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ddda/7ddda2c742e5091781c9a412322b0944785f369d" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS front Olympus TG-830 iHS front"
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 490g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Introduced November 2007
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-510
- Older Model is Olympus E-500
- Refreshed by Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
Below is a in depth assessment of the Olympus E-510 versus Olympus TG-830 iHS, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Waterproof and they are both sold by Olympus. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-510 (10MP) and TG-830 iHS (16MP) and the E-510 (Four Thirds) and TG-830 iHS (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-510 was manufactured 6 years earlier than the TG-830 iHS and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-510 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-830 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the E-510 scores versus the TG-830 iHS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-510 and Olympus TG-830 iHS. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-510 Gallery and Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-510 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
E-510 | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Olympus E-510
TG-830 iHS | E-510 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | ![]() | November 2007 | More recent by 62 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-510 and Olympus TG-830 iHS
E-510 | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch screen |
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-510 enjoys external dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 490 grams (1.08 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-830 iHS has proportions of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-510 versus Olympus TG-830 iHS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the E-510 vs the TG-830 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5db7b/5db7b1360d90db854726ede850dd28d7fe15ea95" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS size comparison Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-510 and TG-830 iHS is 69 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf0ca/cf0caeaf0914d7edad79c2c01dc731b302f176c7" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to visualise the difference between sensor measurements only by looking at technical specs. The visual here will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-510 and TG-830 iHS.
As you have seen, each of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-510 featuring a bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus TG-830 iHS will give more detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures more aggressively. The older E-510 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5043a/5043ae53ebc56af0f289866ea85c99f1e4f09367" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41e8e/41e8e83c1fe067ff30d82dba6dea2d2d30c6f6ee" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
Olympus E-510 | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-510 | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
Also Known as | EVOLT E-510 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2007-11-23 | 2013-01-08 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 490g (1.08 lb) | 214g (0.47 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 52 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.0 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 442 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 shots |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $550 | $0 |