Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
69 Imaging
44 Features
42 Overall
43
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 490g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Introduced November 2007
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-510
- Superseded the Olympus E-500
- Later Model is Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2012
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are created by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-510 (10MP) and the TG-1 iHS (12MP) is pretty close but the E-510 (Four Thirds) and TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") feature different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-510 was released 5 years earlier than the TG-1 iHS which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-510 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the E-510 scores versus the TG-1 iHS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-510 and Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-510 Gallery and Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-510 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
E-510 | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Olympus E-510
TG-1 iHS | E-510 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | May 2012 | November 2007 | Newer by 54 months | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 610k | 230k | Sharper screen (+380k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-510 and Olympus TG-1 iHS
E-510 | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera, you have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-510 offers outside measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 490 grams (1.08 lbs) while the Olympus TG-1 iHS has sizing of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the E-510 compared to the TG-1 iHS.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-510 and TG-1 iHS is 69 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions merely by researching specs. The pic here may offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-510 and TG-1 iHS.
All in all, both cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-510 due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh easier and the Olympus TG-1 iHS will result in greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged E-510 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
Olympus E-510 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-510 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
Also referred to as | EVOLT E-510 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2007-11-23 | 2012-05-08 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 610 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 490 grams (1.08 pounds) | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) |
Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 52 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.0 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 442 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 shots |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | - |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $550 | $399 |