Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-4
69 Imaging
44 Features
42 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7bbb/a7bbb390f9986c1e7150b0a6b5b379be6bcbd98e" alt="Olympus E-510 front Olympus E-510 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07841/0784163336d0cb666d56989c0f306f52fdaab95d" alt="Olympus Tough TG-4 front Olympus Tough TG-4 front"
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 490g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Introduced November 2007
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-510
- Older Model is Olympus E-500
- Later Model is Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Announced April 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus TG-3
- Newer Model is Olympus TG-5
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
Below is a extended analysis of the Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-4, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Waterproof and they are both sold by Olympus. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-510 (10MP) and TG-4 (16MP) and the E-510 (Four Thirds) and TG-4 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-510 was released 8 years earlier than the TG-4 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-510 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-510 scores against the TG-4 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-510 and Olympus Tough TG-4. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-510 Gallery and Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-510 over the Olympus TG-4
E-510 | TG-4 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Olympus E-510
TG-4 | E-510 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | April 2015 | ![]() | November 2007 | More recent by 89 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-510 and Olympus TG-4
E-510 | TG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera, you should think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-510 comes with external dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 490 grams (1.08 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-4 has specifications of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-4 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the E-510 against the TG-4.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/248f1/248f19faf3a1065712d969bc8b792a7ec91155bb" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-4 size comparison Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-4 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-510 and TG-4 is 69 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec8c6/ec8c693d92dde077e983177583299968c295b299" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-4 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-4 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to see the contrast in sensor measurements merely by viewing technical specs. The visual below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-510 and TG-4.
As you can tell, the two cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-510 featuring a bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF easier and the Olympus TG-4 will render more detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures more aggressively. The older E-510 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8baa9/8baa9a72f76075c9b535d553805d1f3fc268d3e5" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-4 sensor size comparison Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-4 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3e94/a3e947fd873516fe7a53db878580fa349e789535" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
Olympus E-510 | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-510 | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
Also called as | EVOLT E-510 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2007-11-23 | 2015-04-13 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 490 gr (1.08 pounds) | 247 gr (0.54 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 52 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.0 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 442 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 380 pictures |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $550 | $379 |