Olympus E-510 vs Olympus VG-120
69 Imaging
44 Features
42 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7bbb/a7bbb390f9986c1e7150b0a6b5b379be6bcbd98e" alt="Olympus E-510 front Olympus E-510 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d8a9/2d8a95487a0964a4254d1d693e044bf6a741f7bd" alt="Olympus VG-120 front Olympus VG-120 front"
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus VG-120 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 490g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Revealed November 2007
- Other Name is EVOLT E-510
- Succeeded the Olympus E-500
- New Model is Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus VG-120 Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Olympus E-510 and Olympus VG-120, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact and they are both offered by Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the E-510 (10MP) and VG-120 (14MP) and the E-510 (Four Thirds) and VG-120 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-510 was introduced 4 years prior to the VG-120 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-510 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus VG-120 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going through a complete comparison, below is a simple summary of how the E-510 scores vs the VG-120 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus VG-120 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-510 & Olympus VG-120. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-510 Gallery & Olympus VG-120 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-510 over the Olympus VG-120
E-510 | VG-120 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-120 over the Olympus E-510
VG-120 | E-510 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2011 | ![]() | November 2007 | More recent by 38 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Common features in the Olympus E-510 and Olympus VG-120
E-510 | VG-120 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus VG-120 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-510 has physical measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 490 grams (1.08 lbs) and the Olympus VG-120 has specifications of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-510 and Olympus VG-120 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the E-510 compared to the VG-120.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7303/d7303ce79430daa8574c479745dad5c01502a74b" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Olympus VG-120 size comparison Olympus E-510 vs Olympus VG-120 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-510 and VG-120 is 69 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db03f/db03f326a6056cb339ec1bc4e7b1e860beb3992c" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Olympus VG-120 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-510 vs Olympus VG-120 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus VG-120 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to see the contrast in sensor measurements merely by researching a spec sheet. The photograph underneath should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-510 and VG-120.
As you can see, both the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-510 having a larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus VG-120 will provide you with greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The older E-510 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f0b9/6f0b9cb62bd361dea3e688ad4286afb3ddb6c07e" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Olympus VG-120 sensor size comparison Olympus E-510 vs Olympus VG-120 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus VG-120 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eec2b/eec2b24a17c29821902cba1882e10f32ea74c1c8" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Olympus VG-120 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-510 vs Olympus VG-120 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus VG-120 Specifications
Olympus E-510 | Olympus VG-120 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-510 | Olympus VG-120 |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-510 | - |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2007-11-23 | 2011-01-06 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 7cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 490 gr (1.08 lb) | 120 gr (0.26 lb) |
Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 52 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.0 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 442 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 160 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $550 | $190 |