Olympus E-510 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
69 Imaging
44 Features
42 Overall
43
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 490g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Launched November 2007
- Other Name is EVOLT E-510
- Succeeded the Olympus E-500
- Later Model is Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Olympus E-510 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both built by Olympus. The resolution of the E-510 (10MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is pretty similar but the E-510 (Four Thirds) and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") have different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-510 was launched 6 years earlier than the XZ-2 iHS and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-510 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the E-510 matches up vs the XZ-2 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-510 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-510 Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-510 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-510 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus E-510
XZ-2 iHS | E-510 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | December 2012 | November 2007 | More recent by 61 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-510 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-510 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-510 enjoys exterior measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 490 grams (1.08 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-510 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at the time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-510 and the XZ-2 iHS.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-510 and XZ-2 iHS is 69 and 85 respectively.
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to picture the gap between sensor measurements just by reviewing specifications. The graphic below will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-510 and XZ-2 iHS.
Plainly, the two cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-510 due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will offer you more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots more aggressively. The older E-510 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus E-510 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-510 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Also called | EVOLT E-510 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2007-11-23 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 490g (1.08 pounds) | 346g (0.76 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 52 | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.2 | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.0 | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | 442 | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 shots |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $550 | $450 |