Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FH2
69 Imaging
44 Features
42 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7bbb/a7bbb390f9986c1e7150b0a6b5b379be6bcbd98e" alt="Olympus E-510 front Olympus E-510 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58d3b/58d3bced54bef37acbf33e0cc1a92af65eb0c1e4" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2 front"
96 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FH2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 490g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Announced November 2007
- Also Known as EVOLT E-510
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-500
- Replacement is Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F3.1-6.5) lens
- 121g - 94 x 54 x 19mm
- Launched January 2011
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FS16
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FH2 Overview
Here, we are analyzing the Olympus E-510 versus Panasonic FH2, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the E-510 (10MP) and FH2 (14MP) and the E-510 (Four Thirds) and FH2 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-510 was launched 4 years before the FH2 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-510 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FH2 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a in depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the E-510 scores against the FH2 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FH2 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-510 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-510 Gallery and Panasonic FH2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-510 over the Panasonic FH2
E-510 | FH2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH2 over the Olympus E-510
FH2 | E-510 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2011 | ![]() | November 2007 | More recent by 37 months |
Display size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus E-510 and Panasonic FH2
E-510 | FH2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FH2 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-510 offers physical measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 490 grams (1.08 lbs) while the Panasonic FH2 has measurements of 94mm x 54mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-510 versus Panasonic FH2 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the E-510 versus the FH2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa6dd/fa6dd88c058a41482d7899d5613a8e0c3f6e6b1f" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FH2 size comparison Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FH2 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-510 and FH2 is 69 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4107d/4107dd44e83ec8c8d91a59abb4cf75de01c7c2a7" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FH2 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FH2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FH2 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to visualise the gap in sensor measurements simply by viewing a spec sheet. The photograph below might give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-510 and FH2.
As you can see, both cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-510 featuring a larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Panasonic FH2 will result in more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older E-510 will be behind in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/653db/653db775950077a7fdf60d85562ce53542591980" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FH2 sensor size comparison Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FH2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FH2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d3a9/6d3a9ddc5f5ba896fc0d875e9590fff2127d9076" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FH2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FH2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FH2 Specifications
Olympus E-510 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-510 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2 |
Also Known as | EVOLT E-510 | Lumix DMC-FS16 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2007-11-23 | 2011-01-05 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.1-6.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.30 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 490 grams (1.08 lb) | 121 grams (0.27 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 94 x 54 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 52 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.0 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 442 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 270 photographs |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $550 | $149 |