Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FS12
69 Imaging
44 Features
42 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7bbb/a7bbb390f9986c1e7150b0a6b5b379be6bcbd98e" alt="Olympus E-510 front Olympus E-510 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41d7f/41d7fcbf43c59375f793394d6bee3fc7ecff0e3f" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 front"
95 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FS12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 490g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Introduced November 2007
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-510
- Previous Model is Olympus E-500
- Updated by Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-124mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 129g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Announced April 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FS12 Overview
In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FS12, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-510 (10MP) and the FS12 (12MP) is pretty similar but the E-510 (Four Thirds) and FS12 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-510 was revealed 17 months prior to the FS12 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-510 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FS12 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going through a complete comparison, below is a simple view of how the E-510 matches up versus the FS12 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FS12 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-510 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-510 Gallery & Panasonic FS12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-510 over the Panasonic FS12
E-510 | FS12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS12 over the Olympus E-510
FS12 | E-510 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | April 2009 | ![]() | November 2007 | More modern by 17 months |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus E-510 and Panasonic FS12
E-510 | FS12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FS12 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-510 has got outside measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 490 grams (1.08 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FS12 has measurements of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FS12 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the E-510 vs the FS12.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d2dc/0d2dc6606b75b4987d06084719e22617fb781a73" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FS12 size comparison Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FS12 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-510 and FS12 is 69 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9c06/b9c06ef8945e8d6146142b04e27cb0fa1be23002" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FS12 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FS12 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FS12 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizes simply by going over a spec sheet. The image here will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-510 and FS12.
Clearly, both cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-510 using its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Panasonic FS12 will offer extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged E-510 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f9e1/7f9e1bb318db7e651cace7bf59ee2846730d6b28" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FS12 sensor size comparison Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FS12 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FS12 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00e37/00e379b56373d8725811483d4c02408f4417dec5" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FS12 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FS12 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FS12 Specifications
Olympus E-510 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-510 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 |
Also Known as | EVOLT E-510 | - |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2007-11-23 | 2009-04-17 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 31-124mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.30 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 490 grams (1.08 lb) | 129 grams (0.28 lb) |
Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 52 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.0 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 442 | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $550 | $228 |