Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FS42
69 Imaging
44 Features
42 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7bbb/a7bbb390f9986c1e7150b0a6b5b379be6bcbd98e" alt="Olympus E-510 front Olympus E-510 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9979/f9979d6158b07faa33963a04f4938253f5f9ce99" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front"
95 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 490g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Announced November 2007
- Also Known as EVOLT E-510
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-500
- Later Model is Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000 (Expand to 6400)
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
- Introduced April 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FS42 Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Olympus E-510 and Panasonic FS42, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-510 (10MP) and the FS42 (10MP) is pretty comparable but the E-510 (Four Thirds) and FS42 (1/2.5") posses totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-510 was revealed 17 months before the FS42 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-510 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-510 scores against the FS42 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FS42 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-510 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-510 Gallery & Panasonic FS42 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-510 over the Panasonic FS42
E-510 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Olympus E-510
FS42 | E-510 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | April 2009 | ![]() | November 2007 | Fresher by 17 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-510 and Panasonic FS42
E-510 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 2.5" | ![]() | 2.5" | Same screen size |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-510 features outside measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") accompanied by a weight of 490 grams (1.08 lbs) and the Panasonic FS42 has specifications of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-510 and Panasonic FS42 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the E-510 vs the FS42.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9b08/b9b088c358523f52171eda27767fd08c5d7b3110" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-510 and FS42 is 69 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2bac5/2bac5ee7ac6e46d109c2821bff9872cfef6c4714" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing simply by seeing technical specs. The visual here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-510 and FS42.
As you have seen, both of these cameras come with the identical megapixel count albeit not the same sensor sizing. The E-510 uses the bigger sensor which should make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult. The older E-510 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c18b4/c18b4f06c3dd8f56dd1896002f4fb63d889ea04f" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6df2/f6df2b88f0fe8c39b2632a70188332d2325fe007" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications
Olympus E-510 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-510 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 |
Also Known as | EVOLT E-510 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2007-11-23 | 2009-04-17 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.5" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1000 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inch | 2.5 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.30 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 490g (1.08 pounds) | 132g (0.29 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 52 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.0 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 442 | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $550 | $580 |