Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FZ35
69 Imaging
44 Features
42 Overall
43
72 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FZ35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 490g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Released November 2007
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-510
- Old Model is Olympus E-500
- Replacement is Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-486mm (F2.8-4.4) lens
- 397g - 118 x 76 x 89mm
- Released July 2010
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FZ38
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FZ35 Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-510 and Panasonic FZ35, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-510 (10MP) and the FZ35 (12MP) is pretty similar but the E-510 (Four Thirds) and FZ35 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-510 was revealed 3 years prior to the FZ35 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-510 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ35 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the E-510 grades versus the FZ35 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FZ35 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-510 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-510 Gallery and Panasonic FZ35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-510 over the Panasonic FZ35
E-510 | FZ35 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ35 over the Olympus E-510
FZ35 | E-510 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2010 | November 2007 | Newer by 31 months | |
Screen dimension | 2.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus E-510 and Panasonic FZ35
E-510 | FZ35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FZ35 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-510 enjoys physical dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 490 grams (1.08 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ35 has specifications of 118mm x 76mm x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") with a weight of 397 grams (0.88 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-510 and Panasonic FZ35 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the E-510 and the FZ35.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-510 and FZ35 is 69 and 72 respectively.
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FZ35 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to picture the gap between sensor dimensions just by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-510 and FZ35.
Clearly, both of those cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-510 with its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Panasonic FZ35 will offer more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-510 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FZ35 Specifications
Olympus E-510 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-510 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 |
Also referred to as | EVOLT E-510 | Lumix DMC-FZ38 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2007-11-23 | 2010-07-06 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 27-486mm (18.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-4.4 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 8.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 490g (1.08 lbs) | 397g (0.88 lbs) |
Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 118 x 76 x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 52 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.0 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 442 | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $550 | $999 |