Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic LX7
69 Imaging
44 Features
42 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7bbb/a7bbb390f9986c1e7150b0a6b5b379be6bcbd98e" alt="Olympus E-510 front Olympus E-510 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1302/e130270d7c3ada3654bb30038583db0f2ff5148f" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7 front"
86 Imaging
35 Features
61 Overall
45
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic LX7 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 490g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Released November 2007
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-510
- Succeeded the Olympus E-500
- New Model is Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400 (Raise to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-90mm (F1.4-2.3) lens
- 298g - 111 x 68 x 46mm
- Launched October 2012
- Superseded the Panasonic LX5
- Updated by Panasonic LX10
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic LX7 Overview
The following is a extensive review of the Olympus E-510 versus Panasonic LX7, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the E-510 (10MP) and the LX7 (10MP) is pretty well matched but the E-510 (Four Thirds) and LX7 (1/1.7") have different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-510 was introduced 5 years prior to the LX7 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-510 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic LX7 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the E-510 grades vs the LX7 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic LX7 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-510 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-510 Gallery and Panasonic LX7 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-510 over the Panasonic LX7
E-510 | LX7 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic LX7 over the Olympus E-510
LX7 | E-510 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2012 | ![]() | November 2007 | Newer by 59 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-510 and Panasonic LX7
E-510 | LX7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic LX7 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-510 comes with outer dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 490 grams (1.08 lbs) and the Panasonic LX7 has sizing of 111mm x 68mm x 46mm (4.4" x 2.7" x 1.8") with a weight of 298 grams (0.66 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-510 versus Panasonic LX7 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at that moment. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-510 compared to the LX7.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f978b/f978b638e1ce82fa83c961727706d67b6ce1ceb1" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic LX7 size comparison Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic LX7 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-510 and LX7 is 69 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6ef0/d6ef0f4048eebb617a01a6e3f5416b41ab77306a" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic LX7 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic LX7 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic LX7 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions only by looking at a spec sheet. The picture underneath may provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-510 and LX7.
Clearly, each of the cameras provide the same megapixels albeit different sensor dimensions. The E-510 offers the bigger sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower depth of field simpler. The more aged E-510 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b059f/b059f94fbf7548f21cf865929fdc488b30eb966b" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic LX7 sensor size comparison Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic LX7 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic LX7 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd80d/bd80dd1b30455a94242d5089ce36b564953ce379" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic LX7 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic LX7 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic LX7 Specifications
Olympus E-510 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-510 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7 |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-510 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2007-11-23 | 2012-10-15 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-90mm (3.8x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/1.4-2.3 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 11.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 8.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 490g (1.08 lb) | 298g (0.66 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 111 x 68 x 46mm (4.4" x 2.7" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 52 | 50 |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.2 | 20.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.0 | 11.7 |
DXO Low light score | 442 | 147 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 images |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $550 | $400 |