Olympus E-510 vs Samsung HZ35W
69 Imaging
43 Features
42 Overall
42
91 Imaging
34 Features
42 Overall
37
Olympus E-510 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 490g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Introduced November 2007
- Also referred to as EVOLT E-510
- Previous Model is Olympus E-500
- Newer Model is Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched June 2010
- Also Known as WB650
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-510 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Here is a thorough analysis of the Olympus E-510 versus Samsung HZ35W, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the E-510 (10MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is relatively comparable but the E-510 (Four Thirds) and HZ35W (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-510 was revealed 3 years prior to the HZ35W and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-510 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a short highlight of how the E-510 matches up against the HZ35W in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-510 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-510 & Samsung HZ35W. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-510 Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-510 over the Samsung HZ35W
| E-510 | HZ35W |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Olympus E-510
| HZ35W | E-510 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | June 2010 | November 2007 | Fresher by 31 months | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 614k | 230k | Clearer screen (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-510 and Samsung HZ35W
| E-510 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither includes Touch screen |
Olympus E-510 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-510 features outside dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") accompanied by a weight of 490 grams (1.08 lbs) and the Samsung HZ35W has dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-510 versus Samsung HZ35W in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select during that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-510 compared to the HZ35W.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-510 and HZ35W is 69 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-510 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to see the contrast in sensor sizing merely by going through specifications. The visual underneath will help give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-510 and HZ35W.
To sum up, both of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-510 with its bigger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Samsung HZ35W will produce more detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs way more aggressively. The older E-510 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-510 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Olympus E-510 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Olympus E-510 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus E-510 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Also called as | EVOLT E-510 | WB650 |
| Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2007-11-23 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
| Available lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 490 gr (1.08 pounds) | 245 gr (0.54 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 52 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.2 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.0 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 442 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $550 | $300 |